[Cricket] The Ashes- England v Australia- 2nd Test, Lords, June 28 - July 02, 2023

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Ashes- 2nd Test- The result ?


  • Total voters
    74
  • Poll closed .


schmunk

Why oh why oh why?
Jan 19, 2018
10,362
Mid mid mid Sussex
That ball is swinging around like crazy, especially for Tongue and Anderson - no excuses to be made, these conditions are an absolute dream for a bowling attack exclusively of seamers.
I've been listening to TMS, where they've been discussing how little the ball is swinging... :shrug:
 




jcdenton08

Offended Liver Sausage
NSC Patron
Oct 17, 2008
14,565
I've been listening to TMS, where they've been discussing how little the ball is swinging... :shrug:
I humbly disagree with their assessment. The bowling hasn’t been world beating, but the conditions couldn’t be better. As I say, if they get the line and length more consistent the swing will do the rest.
 




pasty

A different kind of pasty
Jul 5, 2003
31,040
West, West, West Sussex
Blimey. Been so busy in office this morning I completely forgot about the cricket 😮

Remembered just in time to see the wicket
 


The Wizard

Well-known member
Jul 2, 2009
18,401
The ball hasn’t been swinging massively, it started swinging a little now the lacquer has come off, I expected more swing given the condtions, but it didn’t really matter because the England bowlers didn’t bowl the ball at the stumps enough, less that 6% of the balls in that session would have hit the stumps.

In those conditions you have you challenge the stumps and bowl the right length, we didn’t do that which is a surprise, I have a feeling England would have been 3/4 down against the Aussie attack in those conditions.
 




hans kraay fan club

The voice of reason.
Helpful Moderator
Mar 16, 2005
62,766
Chandlers Ford
He’s been up around 88mph consistently - definitely a quick pace, his problem has been when he gets put away from his shorter ball. He drew a thick inside edge from Warner in a previous over when he gets his line and length right.

That ball is swinging around like crazy, especially for Tongue and Anderson - no excuses to be made, these conditions are an absolute dream for a bowling attack exclusively of seamers.

They must be licking their lips, no blaming the conditions, got to get the line and length right and take our chances. Pope seems to be seen a specialist catcher but he’s pretty hopeless!!
Pope IS a specialist catcher - not at slip though - at short leg, where he is one of the very best in the game :shrug:
 


jcdenton08

Offended Liver Sausage
NSC Patron
Oct 17, 2008
14,565
Pope IS a specialist catcher - not at slip though - at short leg, where he is one of the very best in the game :shrug:
Funnily enough, in the last match he was at short leg for long spells and was getting stick from the commentators for flinching and turning his back several times when (mishit) shots came his way.
 


hans kraay fan club

The voice of reason.
Helpful Moderator
Mar 16, 2005
62,766
Chandlers Ford
Funnily enough, in the last match he was at short leg for long spells and was getting stick from the commentators for flinching and turning his back several times when (mishit) shots came his way.
Fielding at short leg is really easy from the commentary box.
 




Sid and the Sharknados

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 4, 2022
5,720
Darlington
He’s been up around 88mph consistently - definitely a quick pace, his problem has been when he gets put away from his shorter ball. He drew a thick inside edge from Warner in a previous over when he gets his line and length right.

That ball is swinging around like crazy, especially for Tongue and Anderson - no excuses to be made, these conditions are an absolute dream for a bowling attack exclusively of seamers.

They must be licking their lips, no blaming the conditions, got to get the line and length right and take our chances. Pope seems to be seen a specialist catcher but he’s pretty hopeless!!
88mph is top end of fast medium at this level, the sort of pace Anderson and Broad were bowling at a few years ago.
He might be successful, but if he is it'll be because he's good, not because he's quick.
 










Machiavelli

Well-known member
Oct 11, 2013
17,779
Fiveways
88mph is top end of fast medium at this level, the sort of pace Anderson and Broad were bowling at a few years ago.
He might be successful, but if he is it'll be because he's good, not because he's quick.
No it isn't, 88mph is rapid, and easily enough to be included in the 'fast' category. Note also that he'll play on quicker pitches, which will take him north of 90mph.
 












Sid and the Sharknados

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 4, 2022
5,720
Darlington
No it isn't, 88mph is rapid, and easily enough to be included in the 'fast' category. Note also that he'll play on quicker pitches, which will take him north of 90mph.
The pace quoted on the television is measured out of the hand, the pitch doesn't make any difference.
There was a great bit in the Pakistan ODI series last year when they showed how Mark Wood's pace varied as the ball travelled down the pitch, it was leaving his hand at over 90mph and coming off the pitch at about the same speed the ball came out of Chris Woakes' hand.
High 80s on it's own won't shake up the best batters, you need a bit of skill to go with it, which why Anderson only became consistently successful from 2010 when he cut out almost all his bad balls and added the inswinger.
You could try being 6'7" as well, but I don't see him being able to add any extra height.
 




The Wizard

Well-known member
Jul 2, 2009
18,401
Smith must be the most annoying man in history.

Oh wait, there’s Warner… second most, or Ponting? Alright one of…
 


The Wizard

Well-known member
Jul 2, 2009
18,401
Thank god for a bit of tongue, our top line bowlers have bowled very poorly today, not giving it enough lick just need to kiss the surface a bit more
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top