gordonchas
New member
- Jul 1, 2012
- 230
Companies House website documents shows Dr Leah Ltd - 50% owned by Leah Totton, 50% owned by Sugar (via one of his companies). She put in £100 for 100 shares, Sugar's company put in £250,000 for 100 shares. The £250,100 went into the company bank account, the company made a loss of £50K in Yr 1 and now the bank balance is £190K, having covered the losses and bought some assets etc.
Therefore, those accounts clearly show it is Sugar's company's money that is financing the losses and working capital in Yr 1.
Not exactly. The accounts show that morninglordsugar also has £100 of share capital, the balance of £249,900 is shown in reserves where it will be protected. I agree that the money financed the first year losses, however note that it's nowhere even close to the headline figure of the supposed "investment" - £250k.
There was never any intention to fund the business to that extent, therefore the very idea that he is actually putting £250k into establishing these businesses is a lie. This is my point; the common thread in all these companies is that the figure of £1million so often quoted during this series is still sitting pretty much intact in all the various bank accounts. It hasn't been used to finance the running of businesses.