For all those either flicking between TA and the footy, or ignoring the footy altogether, here's the thread for you.
Both teams are making a COMPLETE arse of this IMO.
I think the girls were lucky to win that, they're food was much worse but the client was generous in not taking much off the fee. They were also lucky to get the first contract as their pitch was much worse than the boys.
Although entertaining, that wasn't a very good task because it wasn't a true reflection of the real world. How are you supposed to negotiate when that is your only possible customer, that client could've said he wanted it for a fiver a head and they would've had to do it.
That James bloke, what a cock. He is making himself very unemployabe.
I think the girls were lucky to win that, they're food was much worse but the client was generous in not taking much off the fee. They were also lucky to get the first contract as their pitch was much worse than the boys.
Although entertaining, that wasn't a very good task because it wasn't a true reflection of the real world. How are you supposed to negotiate when that is your only possible customer, that client could've said he wanted it for a fiver a head and they would've had to do it.
That James bloke, what a cock. He is making himself very unemployabe.
The girls were lucky - they were very poor. There will be people who went to the party the girls catered who would have been watching that last night shaking their heads that the girls got away with it.
The critical mistake for the boys (apart from totally getting the theme wrong for the canapé party) was the costings. As soon as they knew the budget per hard they should have worked from there. This is probably a case where minimalism comes to their rescue - very small but expensive looking canapés would have been the answer. The boys over spent (on the silly and unnecessary set dressing and on the food) because they didn't do simple costings. Sadly, the sandwich lad had to go.