blue-shifted
Banned
Premier League clubs have 92%+ full stadiums because on the whole, they have the right sized ground for their fanbase. Some expansion would be welcome at some (Bournemouth being a case in point, probably Liverpool), but by and large, they're about right which is why they're mostly (but not always) full.
You seem to be having some delusions of grandeur. Even if we spent 10 years in the PL and bobbed about challenging for top 10, we do NOT have the worldwide pulling power of the established elite. The gloryhunting banjo's who latch on in China and Thailand are only interested in the Big Six. We are, historically, not a big club. We have grown massively out of all recognition from where we were 10 years ago, but we are not and will never be a south coast Man Utd or Liverpool, pulling in 50k+ a week regardless of who we are playing. And I gave Leicester as an example to emphasise the point, its not just the bottom-feeders who we'd have a 1/3 empty stadium against. Its the other midtable furniture as well who we wouldn't sell out for. And this is of course assuming we manage to stay on this gravy train, which is a LONG way from being assured. Drop down, and we're a Sunderland, in a cavernous half-empty stadium.
Not EVERYONE is walking around in Sussex with a permanent stonk-on for the Premier League. Notions of us aiming to get a 50k stadium are ridiculous and frankly a bit embarrassing.
I'm with Mustafa
It's not that I think we necessarily should build say 50K stadium, I think that
A) With the ludicrous money sloshing round in the Premier League, things which should be financially impossible, like retrofitting a recently built 30k stadium to be a 50k stadium, all of a sudden aren't financially impossible
B) It's possible that we could fill it.
Here's why I believe we could fill it
I was "lucky enough" to be unemployed whilst the Falmer Public Enquiry was underway, so I got to see most of it. The barrister arguing against the development, (I can still picture the public school poshboy now) was consistently grilling Knight and Perry on the finances. Now at the time, we were probably division 4 or 3, had been at Withdean for a couple of years, and his consistent line of attack was that the club shouldn't be allowed permission for the stadium as the business model relied on 12,000 and there's no way we would ever get that as we were only getting 5000 in a 6000 stadium at the time of application. I'll always remember the passion and belief with which Dick Knight spoke about our club. How if we gave them something worth watching, somewhere worth coming to, they would come. It made me dare to believe he was right. I didn't know he was until August 2012.
"Why don't you convert Withdean to a permanent stadium" this Barrister asked Dick Knight? "Because then we'd be sentenced to eternal mediocrity" Knight replied. I'll always remember that.
Now what we have now certainly isn't mediocrity, but I think the principles at play are the same. I think there are another 20,000 in Brighton, or in Sussex there to be brought on board if we build them somewhere to sit then, then crucially, we went out and got them. (8000 already waiting of course, so "only" 12 to go)
Like I say, i'm not dead set on it, it's just if we have 100's of millions of income over the next however many years, I'd prefer us to use a chunk to grow our support base and grow our club rather than spend it all on wages. What a risk it would be, because, you're right, we might go down, we might end up unable to fill it, we might end up with a white elephant. I wonder what Dick thinks about it?