Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Politics] The 2024 US Election - Trump v Harris

Who will win the 2024 Presidential Election?

  • President Joe Biden - Democrat

    Votes: 3 0.8%
  • Donald Trump - Republican

    Votes: 145 39.4%
  • Vice President, Kamala Harris - Democrat

    Votes: 202 54.9%
  • Other Democratic candidate tbc

    Votes: 18 4.9%

  • Total voters
    368
  • This poll will close: .


Crawley Dingo

Political thread tourist.
Mar 31, 2022
1,026
They couldn't replicate it though - and her ballot was correct.


Did you see the one where they were complaining that Trump was 'too far down' the list of candidates and therefore that was somehow cheating as well because voters had to look for his name rather than having it immediately visible near the top (it was in alphabetical order).
Thats how it works in Australia.
 






Crawley Dingo

Political thread tourist.
Mar 31, 2022
1,026
Has there ever been a VP with more pre-VP experience than Kamala Harris? Her CV is absolutely incredible. The slightly clumsy way young Joe spoke about wanting a VP who was non-White and female has been exaggerated for effect by the willfully ignorant right but the fact remains that Kamala Harris the individual, rather than the caricature, is incredibly qualified for that role. She will be an excellent president, even more so if she has a functioning Senate and House of Representatives.

Of course though, should the worst happen, we know that Trump/Republicans believe the VP can do whatever they want when it comes to certifying the election result. And the sitting president can do whatever they want...
Pure chutzpah.
 


Bodian

Well-known member
May 3, 2012
14,023
Cumbria
From the great man himself





Former Vice President Joe Biden said Tuesday that when picking a running mate, he would prefer someone who was “of color and/or a different gender.”


“Whomever I pick, preferably it will be someone who was of color and/or a different gender, but I’m not making that commitment until I know that the person I’m dealing with I can completely and thoroughly trust as authentic and on the same page [as me],” Biden said while speaking to a roundtable of black journalists.
"I’m not making that commitment until I know that the person I’m dealing with I can completely and thoroughly trust as authentic and on the same page [as me]"

ie: he's picking the right candidate for him. If that candidate is black and/or female, great. But he is not saying 'I am only going to pick someone female and/or black' - which is what you are trying to make out.
 














carlzeiss

Well-known member
May 19, 2009
6,208
Amazonia
"I’m not making that commitment until I know that the person I’m dealing with I can completely and thoroughly trust as authentic and on the same page [as me]"

ie: he's picking the right candidate for him. If that candidate is black and/or female, great. But he is not saying 'I am only going to pick someone female and/or black' - which is what you are trying to make out.

President Joe Biden vowed to pick a woman Vice President and promised to appoint a black woman to the Supreme Court. When asked about his plans for a running mate, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders said that “in all likelihood” he would also pick a woman, but that his running mate would be a progressive.

“I commit that if I’m elected President and I have an opportunity to appoint someone to the courts, I’ll appoint the first black woman to the Court,” said Vice President Biden, meaning the Supreme Court. “If I’m elected President, my cabinet and my administration will look like the country, and I commit that I will in fact pick a woman to be Vice President. There are a number of women who are qualified to be president tomorrow. I would pick a woman to be my vice president.”


Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden says he did not feel pressure to select a Black woman as his running mate, describing to ABC the motive behind choosing California Sen. Kamala Harris.


“No, I didn’t feel pressure to select a Black woman,” Biden told ABC’s Robin Roberts in a newly-released clip from a joint interview with Harris set to air in full Sunday night. “But I - what I do think and I’ve said it before, and you’ve heard me say it. I’ve probably said it on your show with you, is that the government should look like the people, look like the country.”


“Fifty-one percent of the people in this country are women,” he continued. “As that old expression goes, women hold up half the sky, and in order to be able to succeed, you’ve got to be dealt in across the board, and no matter what you say, you cannot, I cannot understand and fully appreciate what it means to walk in her shoes, to be an African American woman, with a Indian American background, child of immigrants.”
 




Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
55,661
Faversham
Christ this thread has become a diversity bore-fest.

The ignore button is starting to look tempting if I'm forced to read much more of that tedium.
Thanks for sharing :thumbsup:
 




US Seagull

Well-known member
Jul 17, 2003
4,522
Cleveland, OH
They couldn't replicate it though - and her ballot was correct.


Did you see the one where they were complaining that Trump was 'too far down' the list of candidates and therefore that was somehow cheating as well because voters had to look for his name rather than having it immediately visible near the top (it was in alphabetical order).
So I don't know how it works elsewhere, but in Ohio, they rotate the order of the candidates on the ballot from precinct to precinct. They are alphabetical, but, for example, in my city in precinct 1-A, Harris is at the top of the ballot and Richard Duncan (who? I don't know either) is at the bottom. In the next precinct, 1-B, Duncan moves to the top, Harris moves to second (Trump ends up last on that one), in the next precinct, Trump will end up on top. And so on.

The idea is to make it fairer because of the perception that people will favor voting for the first option. This is probably less of an issue for president, I would imagine, but for some non-partisan judge election where a lot of people might not have bothered looking up the candidates, it could have an impact.
 












Lyndhurst 14

Well-known member
Jan 16, 2008
5,216
The Republicans won the Senate in 2014 - anyone as liberal as Ginsburg would not have been confirmed- she would have had to resign in 2013 while she was at the pinnacle of her judicial career and her mind exceptional sharp if it was to be guaranteed Obama could have replaced her with another liberal candidate.

Even then, it is a bit of a myth to think the Republicans would have confirmed any candidate Obama would put forward under his administration as the Merrick Garland debacle over Anton Scalia’s death in February 2016 proved.

’In an interview with Elle Magazine in the fall of 2014, she said that “anybody who thinks that if I step down, Obama could appoint someone like me, they’re misguided.” No one as liberal as she was could get confirmed, she suggested.

RBG was not the sort of women to be told what to do by anyone and in 2013 she was at the pinnacle of her career, the most popular Justice on the Court amongst the public and a staunch egalitarian when it came to the rights of women and LBQGT. Why on earth should one of the most pioneering justices of the Supreme Court in history be told by a bunch of men in Washington to resign because Congress is so bipartisan and fcuked up?

I still agree with one of the commentators in the Politico article that her hubris in remaining so long is at least partly responsible for the current makeup of SCOTUS
 


chip

Well-known member
Jul 7, 2003
1,263
Glorious Goodwood
So I don't know how it works elsewhere, but in Ohio, they rotate the order of the candidates on the ballot from precinct to precinct. They are alphabetical, but, for example, in my city in precinct 1-A, Harris is at the top of the ballot and Richard Duncan (who? I don't know either) is at the bottom. In the next precinct, 1-B, Duncan moves to the top, Harris moves to second (Trump ends up last on that one), in the next precinct, Trump will end up on top. And so on.

The idea is to make it fairer because of the perception that people will favor voting for the first option. This is probably less of an issue for president, I would imagine, but for some non-partisan judge election where a lot of people might not have bothered looking up the candidates, it could have an impact.
Do they states with swingers ever change? I suppose I am asking if you get a feel for any surprises.
 




peterward

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Nov 11, 2009
12,155
The corrupt supreme Court and what they just did in Virginia to purge voters thus violating federal election law.

Great article 👏 and truly frightening.


Screenshot_20241101_184426_X.jpg
 


BN41Albion

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2017
6,776


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here