As a member of the labour party I see 'socialism' as an almost non-doctrinaire set of structures, that are context-dependent, and designed to bring more benefit to more people, and foster collaboration. That can stretch from local civic initiatives like litter clearing, park enhancement, and volunteering, through to collectivist 'taxation' into a pot to create a more efficient national structure like the NHS (before it became the subject of 'market forces') and a rail system (sadly ruined by privatization) and a postal service (now somewhat redundant, but necessary for those who will never be online) etc.Eh? What is your definition of socialism?
And yet those on the 'loony' wing of the right think socialism is taking from the middle classes (all of this lot think they are middle class) in order to subsidize the feckless poor, the single mother of five (by different fathers) and the payment of vast sums of money to communist union members so they can sit around drinking tea, reading the Daily Star, and plotting revolution. Probably Islamic.