- Nov 11, 2009
- 12,171
Theres more of this utter pig thick madness.
Presenter is doing a great job showing the sheer lunacy of these cult followers.
I don't recall you saying the same? You should have spoken up.No shit, Sherlock
I dunno - maybe it makes some folk less inclined to vote, if they think they're going to lose anyway ...self fulfillingI'm not really that fazed by what the betting markets are indicating. It's a bit like the favourite in a horse race - it doesn't mean it's going to win it just means more money has been placed on it than any other horse in the race. On average a favourite in a horse race wins about 30-35% of the time - not even 50% of the time.
Can the betting market influence voting - who knows ?
Theres more of this utter pig thick madness.
Presenter is doing a great job showing the sheer lunacy of these cult followers.
Theres more of this utter pig thick madness.
Presenter is doing a great job showing the sheer lunacy of these cult followers.
I read that if Kamala wins, Trump will still challenge the result with claims of 'fix' etc. Just like last time.
That's the received wisdom, but J.D. Vance has announced it.That's like a 100% certainty
To whom?Little clips of stupid people are pointless
Little clips of stupid people are pointless
Can this be extrapolated to suggest that most people that bet haven't a clue what they are doing?I'm not really that fazed by what the betting markets are indicating. It's a bit like the favourite in a horse race - it doesn't mean it's going to win it just means more money has been placed on it than any other horse in the race. On average a favourite in a horse race wins about 30-35% of the time - not even 50% of the time.
He's already doing it.I read that if Kamala wins, Trump will still challenge the result with claims of 'fix' etc. Just like last time.
Not helpful
Not helpful
Not helpful
Theres more of this utter pig thick madness.
Presenter is doing a great job showing the sheer lunacy of these cult followers.