Oh dear
Surely that violates the orders/promises around not commenting / threatening and so on. They need to stop him now.
Oh dear
I absolutely agree, Pence showed a level of basic integrity that those around him lacked. It saddens me that he’s subsequently been treated so poorly by his own party.
It shows how little integrity is left in the current Republican Party that it feels like he’s been pretty much ostracised since he acted to save his party’s soul.
I loathe the rabid, short-term “win at all costs” mentality of modern politics. It drives us down the road of stupid, short term decision-making, when responsible government should be looking not just at what affects us now, but how that will impact our children and grandchildren. I’m not sure many U.K. or US politicians are capable of looking beyond the next election cycle.
Oh dear
As proceedings in the civil court began on Friday, the New York judge Arthur Engoron asked Trump’s lawyers why “this blatant violation of the gag order would not result in serious sanctions, including financial sanctions and/or possibly imprisoning him”.
One alternative is to flee to MoscowNow that the kraken has taken a plea deal and agreed to testify I fear we are close to the point at which Trump unleashes the remaining Proud Boy, 3%er and other paramilitary loons to start the assassinations. Gym Jordan's failure to win the House Speakership leaves him with few alternatives.
There is much talked about the shortcomings of our electoral system. Some deserved, some less so. But IMHO the best thing about our system of democracy is it’s ruthlessness after an election.This country, I have more faith. The party almost taken over by right wing weirdos will be obliterated in Dec 2024. My instinct is that the path to EU re-entry will start in the parliament after that.
Fined $5,000Not only that, but also this:
Trump fined $5,000 for social media post violating gag order in fraud trial
Judge Arthur Engoron avoided holding the ex-president in contempt for now, but reserved the right to do sowww.theguardian.com
I really just can't believe pretty much half the population thinks its the interests of their country to have him as President.Trump is almost down there with Putin imho. In addition to his corruption, racism, mocking the disabled, mocking war veterans and families of the dead, illegal financial dealings, he caused deaths. His lies about the election loss whipped up a feeling of rabid injustice amongst bearded idiots …. people died in The Capitol that day.
This country, I have more faith. The party almost taken over by right wing weirdos will be obliterated in Dec 2024. My instinct is that the path to EU re-entry will start in the parliament after that.
The biggest danger to me in the UK is from social media (not NSC ). X and Facebook a cesspit for racists, antisemites, a hard left who imho will try to plague Starmer’s premiership with traps to bring him down.
Hopefully the cerebral rest of the nation will support wise policies, ignoring the noise.
I'd dispute "pretty much half" claim. He never got anywhere near half the popular vote, losing twice in fact. He got about 46-47% of the popular vote in elections with turn out around 60-66%. So really, less than a third of the population.I really just can't believe pretty much half the population thinks its the interests of their country to have him as President.
A year ago all the talk was it would be good for Biden if Trump came through as candidate and he will be sure to lose, now we talking he has a realistic chance of winning. Its like America has been convinced he was never that bad after all
Pretty similar to Thatcher then.I'd dispute "pretty much half" claim. He never got anywhere near half the popular vote, losing twice in fact. He got about 46-47% of the popular vote in elections with turn out around 60-66%. So really, less than a third of the population.
I really just can't believe pretty much half the population thinks its the interests of their country to have him as President.
A year ago all the talk was it would be good for Biden if Trump came through as candidate and he will be sure to lose, now we talking he has a realistic chance of winning. Its like America has been convinced he was never that bad after all
True, but she faced two other serious opponents. So winning an outright majority was always going to be tough. Trump only faced one opponent and still couldn't even get a plurality of votes, let alone a majority.Pretty similar to Thatcher then.
Even against Biden, who doesn't seem entirely with it all the time.True, but she faced two other serious opponents. So winning an outright majority was always going to be tough. Trump only faced one opponent and still couldn't even get a plurality of votes, let alone a majority.
Rubbish - there hasn't been a viable 'third party' in this country for ..... well, pretty much ever. The nearest the Lib Dems ever got (or ever will get) to power is by sacrificing their principles and joining the Tories as a very minor second party in a coalition (essentially Tory) government.True, but she faced two other serious opponents. So winning an outright majority was always going to be tough. Trump only faced one opponent and still couldn't even get a plurality of votes, let alone a majority.
I hear you, but 46-47 percent of pretty much half of those who turned out.I'd dispute "pretty much half" claim. He never got anywhere near half the popular vote, losing twice in fact. He got about 46-47% of the popular vote in elections with turn out around 60-66%. So really, less than a third of the population.
There has been four different occasions of a LibLab pact.Rubbish - there hasn't been a viable 'third party' in this country for ..... well, pretty much ever. The nearest the Lib Dems ever got (or ever will get) to power is by sacrificing their principles and joining the Tories as a very minor second party in a coalition (essentially Tory) government.
As a threat to anybody? - not in a million years!
In 1987, Thatchers third and final election, the Liberal / SDP alliance (the proto-Lib Dems) got 23% of the vote. Labour got about 30%. They were about as viable as Labour.Rubbish - there hasn't been a viable 'third party' in this country for ..... well, pretty much ever. The nearest the Lib Dems ever got (or ever will get) to power is by sacrificing their principles and joining the Tories as a very minor second party in a coalition (essentially Tory) government.
As a threat to anybody? - not in a million years!
Exactly - absolutely no viable threat in a first past the post system.In 1987, Thatchers third and final election, the Liberal / SDP alliance (the proto-Lib Dems) got 23% of the vote. Labour got about 30%. They were about as viable as Labour.
In 83, they had 25% of the vote.
We were talking about % of the popular vote.Exactly - absolutely no viable threat in a first past the post system.