Yea I can possibly see that - however I think he just slurred his last couple of words, imo.My first impression was there are parts of that where the movement of the mouth does not map to the sounds of him talking.
Quite.It's not clear to me which he says, but it's completely irrelevant anyway. He's a narcissistic misogynistic racist who tried to cheat democracy in order to stay in power, and paid an adult film star hush money. Whether or not he also called his opponent a bitch is neither here nor there.
Eh? You agreed with Mellotron, but you added "Clearly calls her a ‘fcuking b*tch’."
GBM disagrees with you. It's definitely not clear. It's no big deal even if you're not right.
Onset of senile dementia , imoYea I can possibly see that - however I think he just slurred his last couple of words, imo.
Onset of senile dementia , imo
Onset of senile dementia , imo
He has refabricated an event in the past involving a helicopter crashOf all the examples of Trump losing it, I don't think this one makes the top 20
I'm not convinced he has dementia. My guess is that he doesn't. But he's 78 years old, and people often get things wrong more at that age (not all do, but if I make it to 78 I'm pretty sure I'll be getting more wrong than usual).
He has refabricated an event in the past involving a helicopter crash
If you're searching for articles questioning the reliability of Rasmussen, you'll find a lot.
"Ad Fontes Media rates Rasmussen Reports in the Strong Right category of bias"Rasmussen Reports Bias and Reliability | Ad Fontes Media
Ad Fontes Media rates Rasmussen Reports, focusing on public opinion polling, as skews right in terms of bias and most reliable in terms ...adfontesmedia.com
I don't know why you want to give the impression that Trump is doing well in the polls.
I cannot take any poll as credible after 2016... or 2008... or 2004.These polls are not credible.
But the one at the top of the thread is - that is what really matters here and she’s rockin’ it .Harris has released no policies given no speech debates and didn't win a primary and yet they would have you believe she is storming in the polls on the back of a tanking economy as VP. These polls are not credible.
Is this right bias due to an industry mean or to the outcome?
I'm not interested in the polls as 99% chance of H Clinton getting elected. I said this bias was for the benefit of Democrats to prevent another coup at their congress.
Harris has released no policies given no speech debates and didn't win a primary and yet they would have you believe she is storming in the polls on the back of a tanking economy as VP. These polls are not credible.
He has a family history of dementia. FWIW. His father was so far gone at the end that they'd just bring him blank pieces of paper to sign because he believed he was still in charge of his business empire.Of all the examples of Trump losing it, I don't think this one makes the top 20
I'm not convinced he has dementia. My guess is that he doesn't. But he's 78 years old, and people often get things wrong more at that age (not all do, but if I make it to 78 I'm pretty sure I'll be getting more wrong than usual).
It’s worth remembering, of course, that Clinton won the popular vote and it’s only the weird setup of the electoral college which handed Trump victory.I'm not interested in the polls as 99% chance of H Clinton getting elected. I said this bias was for the benefit of Democrats to prevent another coup at their congress.
That just isn't the case. Pollsters aim at accuracy, not political positions. It's pretty tricky to be accurate, and failures are due to (usually outdated) methodology which, subsequently, gets corrected.Without studying it, I don't know the details. But some publications lean left, some lean right, and the same is true with some pollsters.
That just isn't the case. Pollsters aim at accuracy, not political positions.
It depends on who's paying the bills. Trump isn't going to pay for a poll that says he's losing. Regardless of reality.That just isn't the case. Pollsters aim at accuracy, not political positions. It's pretty tricky to be accurate, and failures are due to (usually outdated) methodology which, subsequently, gets corrected.