US Seagull
Well-known member
Last edited:
Sadly Trumplestiltskin won't fall under CPS jurisdiction"Making" an indecent image of a child has quite a broad interpretation and it can include simply openening an email attachment, which seems a bit harsh as how do you know the attachment contains child porn unless you open it.
Presumably to establish guilt it would have to come with a prior warning as in "Please find attached...." so there was evidence that you had prior knowledge of what it was you were opening, or if not evidence that the image had been solicited by you..
From the above link of the CPS website...
“To make” has been widely interpreted by the courts and can include the following:
- opening an attachment to an email containing an image: R v Smith; R v Jayson [2003] 1 Cr. App. R. 13
WhoopsWrong thread?
No, it's anyone with morals, who can spot an appalling human a mile off and who find him a lying, misogynistic, boorish criminal with no redeeming features whatsoever.
I think that's called deflection .And yet when I posted that it was Biden not Trump who was suffering Dementia and wouldn't be in the next election all I got was laughter smilies. And yet I'm supposed to believe you and other can spot morals, lies etc when you cant even ID dementia?
Personally I find this an odd comment. I'm a white male and my brother married a black girl from Zim. I don't consider my niece and nephew as black I consider them as mixed heritage.This is the same tactic they like to roll out against black candidates. Trying to deny they are "black". They tried it with Obama too, due to his white mother.
Personally I find this an odd comment. I'm a white male and my brother married a black girl from Zim. I don't consider my niece and nephew as black I consider them as mixed heritage.
Insane nonsense bollocks. Just verbal diarrhoea. Word salad. Meaningless waffle.
Amazing on the very rare occasions you get to see him in front of neutrals, their reactions and laughter remind you “oh yeah, this guy is genuinely unhinged.”
Donald Trump agreed to an interview with the National Association of Black Journalists (NABJ), this is how it started:
It didn't get any better from there...
Indeed - even from the weekend there was a close up with no damage. Miracle eh
Remember... " The Doctor said to me " You are a great ear grower sir " apparently, no one can grow new ears like me.. "
As long as its democratic its good. Authoritarian dictatorship not so good.What is your opinion on a constitutional republic?
No the issue is credibility. Most of the claims about Trump do not stand up to close scrutiny, neither do they stand up to the test of time.I think that's called deflection .
As long as its democratic its good. Authoritarian dictatorship not so good.
But what about his ear? Do you think his claim that he lost a 2cm chunk credible? Does it stand up to close scrutiny?No the issue is credibility. Most of the claims about Trump do not stand up to close scrutiny, neither do they stand up to the test of time.
Obama held off appointing to the Supreme Court just before his term came to an end - as is the convention.So what do you call a party that is talking about stacking the Supreme Court, redistricting the Senate as its "To rural", importing 8 million illegal immigrants/voters worth 14 seats with congressional redistricting in 2030 as well as extra electoral college votes?
The doctor said to me, with tears in his eyes,.........Remember... " The Doctor said to me " You are a great ear grower sir " apparently, no one can grow new ears like me.. "