Klaas
I've changed this
- Nov 1, 2017
- 2,656
Right? And then has the chutzpah to act like he's all about respectful debate.There have been plenty of questions of this thread that you've simply dodged.
Right? And then has the chutzpah to act like he's all about respectful debate.There have been plenty of questions of this thread that you've simply dodged.
You seem new to this. If you are corrupt and wish to take down a political opponent you go after all those around him, this is how its done in socialist dictatorships.
He's meant to hold his shares at least 6 months, though yesterday I read he's already on manoeuvres to try and dump his on the heads of the scammed MAGA lovers.I think it’s obvious to all of us that for Trump, truth doesn’t pay.
He's meant to hold his shares at least 6 months, though yesterday I read he's already on manoeuvres to try and dump his on the heads of the scammed MAGA lovers.
Like this fella.....
Like those that died of Covid to Own the Libs.Bankrupting himself to Own The Libs
He's meant to hold his shares at least 6 months, though yesterday I read he's already on manoeuvres to try and dump his on the heads of the scammed MAGA lovers.
Like this fella.....
Grifters gonna grift
Except there appears a lack of state witnesses.You seem new to this - If you are the Attorney General and wish to bring down an infamous and powerful criminal you prosecute all those around him and turn them into State Witnesses, this is how it’s done in criminal justice systems.
That's a huge number of miscarriages of justice then. I wonder that the whole of America is not up in arms about it.
Not judging by the number of jurors unable to be on the panel because they can't stand the guy. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/apr/17/donald-trump-jury-selection-jurors-speak-outIt may well be.
You seem new to this - If you are the Attorney General and wish to bring down an infamous and powerful criminal you prosecute all those around him and turn them into State Witnesses, this is how it’s done in criminal justice systems.
Not judging by the number of jurors unable to be on the panel because they can't stand the guy. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/apr/17/donald-trump-jury-selection-jurors-speak-out
The current trial is mainly about falsifying documents. A pretty standard offence, and pretty standard prosecution normally - hundreds a year. It's only because it's Trump we're hearing about it.Except it isn't. None of these charges have precedence. We live in a country that uses case law where each charge is reference by the previous trial as a guide to guilt, sentencing etc like the USA. Even the charge relating to the Classified Documents had previous offenders but no charges. If you cant see this as a fit up job i cant help you.
Because the offenders co-operated and returned the documents. Rather than lying about them, and secretly trying to move them.Even the charge relating to the Classified Documents had previous offenders but no charges.
There is nothing standard about this prosecution. Read the article and try to comprehend the lengths these twisted b*stards are going to turn a misdemeanor, at best, into a felony. And yes, it’s only because it’s Trump.The current trial is mainly about falsifying documents. A pretty standard offence, and pretty standard prosecution normally - hundreds a year. It's only because it's Trump we're hearing about it.