Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Albion] Thank god for VAR







Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,148
Goldstone
They have been instructed to not do so.
Haven't they been instructed to flag after the ball goes in the net, to show they think it's offside?

Remember Shelvey 'scored' an 'obviously offside' goal after the flag went up a few weeks ago, keeper not really bothering to attempt a save, then VAR showed player was onside and the goal was given.
Yes, the linesman got that one wrong on all counts.
 


Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
56,108
Faversham
Haven't they been instructed to flag after the ball goes in the net, to show they think it's offside?

Yes. But it doesn't really matter - VAR will check every goal. It is the premature flaggery that's the real problem, as you concur :thumbsup:

One bit I don't get is when VAR checks a pen, see it as a pen, then says 'nah, you're alright' to the ref who waved it on. That should be changed. It isn't for VAR to judge whether the error was clear and obvious or not. An error is an error.
 








Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
56,108
Faversham
Except when it comes to subjective decisions, where what you think is an error, is more likely a difference of opinion/interpretation.

Indeed. But we have seen some (a minority I admit) VAR decisions where there is no subjectivity and VAR has not overruled the ref's error. Look at the Maupay penalty at Palace. We got all that 'would have been given had he gone down' bollocks. It was a penalty and the VAR boys made the wrong decicision. I seem to recall a Murray handball last season that went in our favour - same deal - it was a nailed on penalty.

These would be my VAR tweaks:

1. If the VAR boys can't decide in 20 seconds (i.e., it is too close to call: epidermis offside, 'coming together', ball to hand) they should advise the referee to err on the side of the putative villain (the hand baller, the fouler, the offside player). No need to count angels on heads of pins and have long meaningful philosophical conversations.

2. If VAR sees an important referee error (handball, foul, offside) that has had consequences (goal, penalty, card) VAR should TELL the ref to change the decision (or, if we continue with this charade that all decisions are made by the ref and not VAR: look at the replay). FFS!

IMV the two problems therefore are faffing over 50:50 decisions and VAR being too weak over 55:45 decisions (and arguably clear and obvious referee bollox ups).

Time and moaning will sort it....
 


Deadly Danson

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Oct 22, 2003
4,611
Brighton
Indeed. But we have seen some (a minority I admit) VAR decisions where there is no subjectivity and VAR has not overruled the ref's error. Look at the Maupay penalty at Palace. We got all that 'would have been given had he gone down' bollocks. It was a penalty and the VAR boys made the wrong decicision. I seem to recall a Murray handball last season that went in our favour - same deal - it was a nailed on penalty.

These would be my VAR tweaks:

1. If the VAR boys can't decide in 20 seconds (i.e., it is too close to call: epidermis offside, 'coming together', ball to hand) they should advise the referee to err on the side of the putative villain (the hand baller, the fouler, the offside player). No need to count angels on heads of pins and have long meaningful philosophical conversations.

2. If VAR sees an important referee error (handball, foul, offside) that has had consequences (goal, penalty, card) VAR should TELL the ref to change the decision (or, if we continue with this charade that all decisions are made by the ref and not VAR: look at the replay). FFS!

IMV the two problems therefore are faffing over 50:50 decisions and VAR being too weak over 55:45 decisions (and arguably clear and obvious referee bollox ups).

Time and moaning will sort it....

I loathe VAR but, if we have to have it then I think your tweaks are pretty much spot on.
 


Hampster Gull

Well-known member
Dec 22, 2010
13,465
You are giving the linesman too much credit he can flag afterwards. He didnt so he just completely effed up that decision and was bailed out by VAR and one of the reasons why it has been brought in.

Completely disagree with you, it’s a cop out for them now. :shrug:
 




Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,148
Goldstone
Yes. But it doesn't really matter - VAR will check every goal. It is the premature flaggery that's the real problem, as you concur :thumbsup:
Indeed.

One bit I don't get is when VAR checks a pen, see it as a pen, then says 'nah, you're alright' to the ref who waved it on. That should be changed. It isn't for VAR to judge whether the error was clear and obvious or not. An error is an error.
I think Acker said at the start of the season that it wasn't going to work like that. It'll probably change with time as they work out what works well and what doesn't. Presumably in a few years different leagues will try and pick the good bits from each other, and work towards something which is similar. Or maybe I'm hoping for too much.
 


GT49er

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 1, 2009
49,186
Gloucester
One bit I don't get is when VAR checks a pen, see it as a pen, then says 'nah, you're alright' to the ref who waved it on. That should be changed. It isn't for VAR to judge whether the error was clear and obvious or not. An error is an error.

Except when it comes to subjective decisions, where what you think is an error, is more likely a difference of opinion/interpretation.
But that was at the very heart of VAR, so we were told - and the reason for the pitch-side screens - was that the final decision would rest with the on-pitch referee, not the VAR

Oh for the day a ref has the balls to jog to the side of the pitch, look at the monitor, and say. "Balls to that, I thought it was a penalty, and I still do, so I'm giving it anyway!" Then we might get football back.............................
 


trueblue

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
10,954
Hove
They are pointless now, may as well just check VAR after every goal.

At the moment sometimes the refs stop play and other times they let play continue - it’s so inconsistent.

They already check VAR after every goal. Perhaps sometimes you haven't noticed it because it can be pretty quick. With the linesman not flagging Saturday, I suspect he wasn't 100% sure that the header came from a Sheff Utd player. Could have flicked off an Albion defender... hence the check. Otherwise, absolute howler.
 








Saunders

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2017
2,296
Brighton
As I’ve implied already, the officials are often not making calls as they know it goes to VAR.

So you think thats ok that they dont flag taking into account I know they are told to wait but they can still flag after the goal he didnt. Disagreeing with me? Lost here.
 






Can’t find the big thread to bounce but we would probably have lost that game yesterday without VAR. Any anti’s out there softening?
 


Uh_huh_him

Well-known member
Sep 28, 2011
12,121
Can’t find the big thread to bounce but we would probably have lost that game yesterday without VAR. Any anti’s out there softening?

I thought it was odd that we started chanting it's not football anymore, whilst waiting for VAR to overturn a disallowed goal..
 






Super Steve Earle

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2009
8,929
North of Brighton
Can’t find the big thread to bounce but we would probably have lost that game yesterday without VAR. Any anti’s out there softening?
I haven't changed. I bloody love VAR. I'm convinced it helps Brighton get the decisions refs might otherwise not give us and yesterday only adds to my belief.
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here