Ten Children with ten different women

[Spicy]

Castration is the only answer in the current climate of budget "cuts". Now where are those scissors.

 

[Don Quixote]

The slags shouldn't go to bed with him then should they?!

 

[seagullsovergrimsby]

He was a bit more charming than to offer to have sex in some bushes though and he did give me his Saver ticket (which I heard him shout he wanted back as I was running off the bus).

Was that when he realised there was still 6 days travel left on it ?

 

[seagullsovergrimsby]

To be fair there are 2 sides to a story , these girls know that by being a single mum they wont have to do any meaningful work until their kids have finished full time education. An added bonus is getting a flat which is paid for by housing benefit and no council tax to pay either.

 

[Spicy]

To be fair there are 2 sides to a story , these girls know that by being a single mum they wont have to do any meaningful work until their kids have finished full time education. An added bonus is getting a flat which is paid for by housing benefit and no council tax to pay either.

Exactly and he just happened to be the first passing penis.

 

[Perkino]

How on earth have 10 females lowered themselves to the point that they would sleep with him

 

[Freddie Goodwin.]

It's his charm. There have been articles about him in The Sunderland Echo several times over the last few years, unfortunately. In one of them I recall him describing his technique. He gets on the bus and look for a young woman sitting alone. He sits down beside her and using his wit and repartee persuades her to have sex with him; either in the bushes as soon as they alight the bus, or that night. That's why I repeat, blame the stupid women every bit as much, or more, than him. To have a baby with as much forthought as most of us would give to choosing the curtains for our living-rooms, shows the problem is more to do with irresponsible women than the waste of space that is Keith McDonald.

I know someone who has a similar technigue of chatting girls up on buses but his repartie of "You're gorgeous, you've got beautiful eyes" hasn't really worked yet!

 

[drew]

How on earth have 10 females lowered themselves to the point that they would sleep with him

One suspects that alcohol may have been involved!!!!

 

[Leekbrookgull]

Try this !

 

[Castello]

Ofcourse something should be done about those who break the law to evade taxation, though there's a very important difference between breaking the law, and having clever accountants find the ways in which individuals reduce the amount of tax they pay, completely within the law.
I agree completely with those blaming the LEGAL benefit claimants discussed in this thread. The tax dodgers you refer to are probably contributing a great deal to The Exchequer, even though they should be contributing more. Not only are the feckless ten single mothers and the hundreds of thousands like them contributing precisely nothing to our economy, in most cases; they are costing umpteen times the amount that is possibly being defrauded by the tax dodgers.
I don't know how they can do it, but if this government could begin to do something to make life less cosy for the Keith McDonalds and his stupid co-parents of this country, then more power to their elbows. Sorting out this underclass is one of GB's biggest challenges, but one with no easy solution.

Factually wrong!

15 times more money is lost to the economy through tax evasion (£15 billion) each year than through benefit fraud (£1 billion). in fact this is getting worse. In the late 80's it was only ten times the amount.

http://citywire.co.uk/new-model-adviser/tax-evasion-costs-treasury-15-times-more-than-benefit-fraud/a378274

However if it makes you feel better we do spend more than 10 times as much stopping benefit fraud as we do stopping tax evasion. Perhaps if we prioritised the other way round we would be better off.

But why do that when people would rather attack the poor for being desperate than the rich for being greedy.

 

[Barnham Seagull]

I think the film Idiocracy sums it up well and could be the way we are heading!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSROlfR7WTo&feature=related

 

[ROKERITE]

Factually wrong!

15 times more money is lost to the economy through tax evasion (£15 billion) each year than through benefit fraud (£1 billion). in fact this is getting worse. In the late 80's it was only ten times the amount.

http://citywire.co.uk/new-model-adviser/tax-evasion-costs-treasury-15-times-more-than-benefit-fraud/a378274

However if it makes you feel better we do spend more than 10 times as much stopping benefit fraud as we do stopping tax evasion. Perhaps if we prioritised the other way round we would be better off.

But why do that when people would rather attack the poor for being desperate than the rich for being greedy.

I'm afraid you've missed the point. I'm not comparing tax fraud to benefit fraud; I'm comparing possible tax fraud to the cost of our out of control benefits culture. Spending ten times as much stopping benefit fraud as we do stopping tax evasion doesn't bother me; if we started making real cuts in the amount paid to the sort of selfish, stupid young women discussed in this thread I'd be pleased.
"Attacking the poor for being desperate": which desperate poor would that be?

 

[Boroseagull]

Such a shame the benifit system is not run as it is here in Spain [same EU, same Human Rights] where unemployment, and you 'clock in' to your local Ayuntamiento each week, is only payable for 3 months. Then you MUST do a community job like road repairs, gardens, street maintainence to continue to receive payment. The other option is to attend & complete a locally recognised training facility. As for the girls, well they can expect the 200 euros birth gift [soon to be finished] and 36 euros a year, with their family expected to supply housing.

 

[Trufflehound]

Try this !

Smacking two bricks together works just as well, and doesn't hurt a bit....







...provided you don't get get your thumbs caught.

 

[Mr Everyone]

I'm afraid you've missed the point. I'm not comparing tax fraud to benefit fraud; I'm comparing possible tax fraud to the cost of our out of control benefits culture. Spending ten times as much stopping benefit fraud as we do stopping tax evasion doesn't bother me; if we started making real cuts in the amount paid to the sort of selfish, stupid young women discussed in this thread I'd be pleased.
"Attacking the poor for being desperate": which desperate poor would that be?

Possible tax fraud??

You may not want to acknowledge the existence and huge burden to the country of tax fraud, but it is happening.

It appears that you have a greater intolerance toward the benefit cheat, citing an 'out of control benefit culture'. You have then stated that you don't mind the country spending a large sum of taxpayers' money chasing the tax thief!

Those who are in receipt of welfare incidentally pay tax.

In response to the second part of your text that I underlined. Where you referring to tax or benefit cheats?

 

[El Presidente]

What saddens me the most is that newspaper editors thinks this is worthy of inches...

The Sunderland lasses clearly wanted his inches though.

I think VIZ was ahead of both the Mail and the Torygraph with this one

 

[perseus]

Grocer Jack

Rich Twats and Scullery Boys may get snared by the

Beware The Sperm-Jacker - AskMen.com UK

 

[Freddie Goodwin.]

When you are doing your best to live on your hard earned and simply get through life, then the antics of the tax dodger and the benefit cheat are both pretty annoying.

 

[Barrel of Fun]

It might be 15 children from 14 women. A few more have come forward apparently.

 

[perseus]

Unicorn Root

When you are doing your best to live on your hard earned and simply get through life, then the antics of the tax dodger and the benefit cheat are both pretty annoying.

Get him a job as a Scaffolder.