[Cricket] Sussex CCC - 2024 edition

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊



Eeyore

Colonel Hee-Haw of Queen's Park
NSC Patron
Apr 5, 2014
25,942
I don't know why Sussex stopped playing at Arundel in particular, I think most people thought matches there were one of the highlights of the cricket season.

Durham (who obviously don't host a Hundred team because reasons) are playing a game up in Newcastle on Friday which I'm hoping to go to. I'll admit that the increased number of outground games is a benefit from the Hundred even if I think counties should be doing it anyway.
Arundel was always a good festival. It would have been nice to have seen the 50 over games v Herts there recently. The ground does host various matches like A team and MCC stuff, but I don't know why Sussex have stopped the festival.

Ironically, Hampshire have played more Championship games there than us in recent years !
 




Munchkin

Well-known member
Jul 12, 2005
2,424
Littlehampton
Arundel was always a good festival. It would have been nice to have seen the 50 over games v Herts there recently. The ground does host various matches like A team and MCC stuff, but I don't know why Sussex have stopped the festival.

Ironically, Hampshire have played more Championship games there than us in recent years !

All about revenue. The club made a conscious decision to fully utilise Hove for all games following the pandemic to maximise income.

When games are taken away from HQ it actually costs the club money rather than generating income.

I believe a positive financial year may well see the club change their stance in the coming seasons as they appreciate and understand how popular the likes of Arundel and Horsham are with the members and supporters.
 


Sid and the Sharknados

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 4, 2022
5,720
Darlington
All about revenue. The club made a conscious decision to fully utilise Hove for all games following the pandemic to maximise income.

When games are taken away from HQ it actually costs the club money rather than generating income.

I believe a positive financial year may well see the club change their stance in the coming seasons as they appreciate and understand how popular the likes of Arundel and Horsham are with the members and supporters.
I know this is true, to the extent that it's cheaper to have all the games in one place and lots of counties have made similar decisions. But it seems astonishingly short sighted to remove the most popular part of the season, aside from the emotional idea that a county club should make some effort to spread the game around, and that this can't have been any less true in the hundred plus years they managed to have games at Arundel, Eastbourne etc.
 


fly high

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2011
1,739
in a house
364 to win. Am I being defeatist in thinking fat chance and no chance.
 
Last edited:


thedonkeycentrehalf

Moved back to wear the gloves (again)
Jul 7, 2003
9,355
159/1 off 26 in reply so not out of it yet but a hefty run rate to keep up with in a 50 over contest
 




thedonkeycentrehalf

Moved back to wear the gloves (again)
Jul 7, 2003
9,355
196/4 off 34.1, Haines 82no.

From the stream doesn't seem like that many in attendance. Going back to the earlier discussion, if this had been at Arundel would probably have been full.

I get the cost argument but likewise, a full house at Arundel would not only increase income but also potentially increase interest in the county game with those who don't go to Hove.
 


Yes Chef

Well-known member
Apr 11, 2016
1,908
In the kitchen
Went to the Hertfordshire game at Arundel, and it was great to be back there, the sun was out and the view over the Arun Valley was gorgeous.

It was always the first fixture that I looked for each summer .

Grew up in Eastbourne, so know The Saffrons very well. I've spent plenty of time in the beer tent at Horsham as well, where there was always lots of runs and lots of wickets.

Out grounds are great. Love going to Hove, but there must be some provision for other venues (especially Arundel)
 


thedonkeycentrehalf

Moved back to wear the gloves (again)
Jul 7, 2003
9,355
Lost by 10 runs but great effort from Haines and Simpson to get us that close. I think they said in three games this season, it was the first time Leicestershire had got Simpson out but not before he had plundered 487 runs from them
 




PILTDOWN MAN

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 15, 2004
19,636
Hurst Green
All about revenue. The club made a conscious decision to fully utilise Hove for all games following the pandemic to maximise income.

When games are taken away from HQ it actually costs the club money rather than generating income.

I believe a positive financial year may well see the club change their stance in the coming seasons as they appreciate and understand how popular the likes of Arundel and Horsham are with the members and supporters.
Crap, sorry. It doesn't cost money. It's that it doesn't raise as much. It IS not loss making.

This is COUNTY cricket not Brighton And Hove.

Short sighted.
 


Munchkin

Well-known member
Jul 12, 2005
2,424
Littlehampton
Crap, sorry. It doesn't cost money. It's that it doesn't raise as much. It IS not loss making.

This is COUNTY cricket not Brighton And Hove.

Short sighted.
I can assure you it costs money. Mainly due to the contract obligations with Sodexo. Arundel more so than Horsham (due to hospitality obligations and additional stewarding / logistics). Quite happily share more detail with you if you want to DM me.
 


PILTDOWN MAN

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 15, 2004
19,636
Hurst Green
So playing to full sponsored tents loses money.
 




Munchkin

Well-known member
Jul 12, 2005
2,424
Littlehampton
So playing to full sponsored tents loses money.
You think all the hospitality obligations are ‘sponsored tents’ I’m afraid not.

Trust me. Playing away from HQ costs the club money its doesn’t generate income. End of story.

When finances and revenue have never been more of a focus is natural they are going to utilise Hove for all home games.
 


PILTDOWN MAN

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 15, 2004
19,636
Hurst Green
You think all the hospitality obligations are ‘sponsored tents’ I’m afraid not.

Trust me. Playing away from HQ costs the club money its doesn’t generate income. End of story.

When finances and revenue have never been more of a focus is natural they are going to utilise Hove for all home games.
End of story call it Hove CC then.

I used to be heavily involved in the Horsham games. It always made money playing elsewhere added to which it introduced others to the game especially children. However since to advent of the f***ing 100 it is the death of cricket during the summer to most. Hope it all goes to pot.
 


Terry Butcher Tribute Act

Well-known member
Aug 18, 2013
3,686
You think all the hospitality obligations are ‘sponsored tents’ I’m afraid not.

Trust me. Playing away from HQ costs the club money its doesn’t generate income. End of story.

When finances and revenue have never been more of a focus is natural they are going to utilise Hove for all home games.
How can pulling 4000 at Arundel or Horsham for one day cost the club more than getting 1000 in at Hove?
 




PILTDOWN MAN

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 15, 2004
19,636
Hurst Green
How can pulling 4000 at Arundel or Horsham for one day cost the club more than getting 1000 in at Hove?
Perhaps shit contracts. How the catering can determine where a game is played is beyond me. Taking the game around the county, playing to full crowds as opposed to a few old gits and a seagull must or rather should be a priority and it should easily make more money.
 


thedonkeycentrehalf

Moved back to wear the gloves (again)
Jul 7, 2003
9,355
Not that anyone seems interested in the one day cup but Sussex were put into bat by Gloucestershire and limped to 101/6 off 33 before the rain came.

Looks like it has cleared up as the outfield covers have just started to come off.
 


hans kraay fan club

The voice of reason.
Helpful Moderator
Mar 16, 2005
62,766
Chandlers Ford
Not that anyone seems interested in the one day cup but Sussex were put into bat by Gloucestershire and limped to 101/6 off 33 before the rain came.

Looks like it has cleared up as the outfield covers have just started to come off.
116/8 now.

Not really a surprise though, given it is basically the Sussex 2nd XI against a near full-strength Gloucestershire.

1723037638306.png
 


timbha

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
10,515
Sussex
How can pulling 4000 at Arundel or Horsham for one day cost the club more than getting 1000 in at Hove?
The weather is a big factor. Suffer the cost of putting everything in place at Arundel and then it rains is very costly with insurance costs prohibitive.
 






goldstone rocks

Active member
Feb 25, 2009
164
Top 3 scorers for Sussex CCC are all Preston Nomads players and none of them were allowed to play on Sunday in Area Final at Amersham.
ECB Regionals finals August 25 which are the Quarter Finals in England Club T20 cricket. Hope they are allowed to play this time. 10.00am vs Hayes representing Kent. Bristol vs Oundle 13.00. Both winners play each other 4pm. Then a South vs North Final Sept 22.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top