You might be.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Politics] Sue Gray is Red
- Thread starter Flagship
- Start date
"It is no clear that the entire process was tainted, and that the investigation should be deemed null and void".
(Oh hang on - that would mean having to ask someone else to repeat the investigation....)
(Is there any way of binning the Gray report without reconsidering the evidence? I can see that Sunak will be considering this. But he will also be considering whether there is any value in attempting to save Johnson's neck, value in terms of whether having Johnson back in parliament is in Sunak's interest, and value in terms of whether there is the slightest snowball's chance in hell of a Johnson whitewash attempt succeeding).
"Let me restate that. Whilst there may be cause for concern over some aspects of the generation of the Gray report, it would be wrong for me to interfere with due process and....."
The headbangers are, I suspect, not going to find Sunak full square behind their conniption fit. No, I think that this time the greased piglet may be done for. How lovely.
ManOfSussex
We wunt be druv
It took me all of about reading 5 posts to work out they were one and the same. That's getting on for nearly 2 minutes of my life I ain't getting back.
The Gray report doesn't really matter now. The committee are doing their own investigations anyway - and will have far more weight and impact in the long run.
Wokeworrier
Active member
No idea, but I would hope she had a low tolerance for people continually derailing threads ...
BadFish
Huge Member
- Oct 19, 2003
- 18,201
Are the UK right-wing press really trying to persuade you that the independent investigator (appointed after the original investigator, appointed by Boris was found to have attended the parties) somehow managed to concoct the whole story and involve the police? Just because she has taken another job.
How on earth do they managed to keep selling papers. Surely in this day and age, more people are more enlightened.
How on earth do they managed to keep selling papers. Surely in this day and age, more people are more enlightened.
nicko31
Well-known member
Trust me there a rump of Johnson loving Mail readers will belief this.
BadFish
Huge Member
- Oct 19, 2003
- 18,201
I believe you, I just can't work out how people haven't seen through the Mail etc yet.
Incredible.
She did his curtains too? The cheek of the woman...
St Leonards Seagull
Well-known member
- Jul 10, 2012
- 554
Yeah you’d be banned
GloryDays
Well-known member
GloryDays
Well-known member
Hopefully she can stitch up Liz Truss as well after she totally f***ed my mortgage.
Come on, Sue.
Come on, Sue.
- Jan 3, 2012
- 17,355
6
i laughed out loud yesterday in Waitrose when I saw the headline on the front page of the Mail. Can’t remember the exact wording, but honestly……
- Jul 10, 2003
- 27,772
So that's a yes, then
Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
I posted it earlier in the thread. It was ludicrous.
- Jan 3, 2012
- 17,355
#52 if anyone wants to check it out.
hilarious? Ludicrous? Or just pathetic?
midnight_rendezvous
Well-known member
Is this an attempt at satire, sarcasm, tongue in cheek or are you just monumentally stupid? Hard to tell over the internet these days
- Oct 12, 2022
- 2,693
The last time I checked, circulation across daily newspapers had dropped considerably. Mainly through migration to online, but certainly there’s no chance of the Sun winning anything for anyone these days. If you take the Guardian and the Times you get the centre-left and centre-right opinions. If you can afford to take the FT you get the facts.
Internationally, Reuters online are pretty good, you will need to sign-up but no cost and they’re fair and accurate, but sadly the rest of the British daily print media is frankly not fit for toilet paper. It will confirm your existing biases, and fail to educate or inform.