Not many left now but if there are any then MOST certainly yes!!!
I assume you mean yes to hunting them down ? If so I agree with you but pottert might see it as pointless because of their age, the time span and the costs involved.
Not many left now but if there are any then MOST certainly yes!!!
If it was my son/daughter I would have chopped his hand/cock off but I would have done it when it happened not 30 years later.
If the offences were committed by non celebs then (a) would not be reported & (b) would not be investigated 30 years later.
If it was my son/daughter I would have chopped his hand/cock off but I would have done it when it happened not 30 years later.
If the offences were committed by non celebs then (a) would not be reported & (b) would not be investigated 30 years later.
Am I the only person that dosent see the point in all this.
Saville,Stuart hall,DLT,Rolf Harris & im sure there are many more offences that were committed many years ago by so called celebs.
Why were these so called offences not reported 20,30 or 40 years ago when the incidents happened.
Why is it that when we live in a day & age when you can't say boo to a goose do all these accusations come out.
When I was a little boy standing in the north stand it was seen as acceptable to make monkey chants to black players,
I would be lying if I said I never joined in,but that was then & this is now.Does that mean that if a retired footballer decides that we was racially abused at the goldstone 30 years ago that the police will investigate & see if we have a case to answer.
What I'm trying to say is what was acceptable 30 years ago may not be now.
Spending millions of pounds of public money to send men that are in there 70's & 80's to prison for crimes that were committed 30 years ago & were not investigated at the time seems pointless to me.
You are a complete fool
Am I the only person that dosent see the point in all this.
Saville,Stuart hall,DLT,Rolf Harris & im sure there are many more offences that were committed many years ago by so called celebs.
Why were these so called offences not reported 20,30 or 40 years ago when the incidents happened.
Why is it that when we live in a day & age when you can't say boo to a goose do all these accusations come out.
When I was a little boy standing in the north stand it was seen as acceptable to make monkey chants to black players,
I would be lying if I said I never joined in,but that was then & this is now.Does that mean that if a retired footballer decides that we was racially abused at the goldstone 30 years ago that the police will investigate & see if we have a case to answer.
What I'm trying to say is what was acceptable 30 years ago may not be now.
Spending millions of pounds of public money to send men that are in there 70's & 80's to prison for crimes that were committed 30 years ago & were not investigated at the time seems pointless to me.
Am I the only person that dosent see the point in all this.
Saville,Stuart hall,DLT,Rolf Harris & im sure there are many more offences that were committed many years ago by so called celebs.
Why were these so called offences not reported 20,30 or 40 years ago when the incidents happened.
Why is it that when we live in a day & age when you can't say boo to a goose do all these accusations come out.
When I was a little boy standing in the north stand it was seen as acceptable to make monkey chants to black players,
I would be lying if I said I never joined in,but that was then & this is now.Does that mean that if a retired footballer decides that we was racially abused at the goldstone 30 years ago that the police will investigate & see if we have a case to answer.
What I'm trying to say is what was acceptable 30 years ago may not be now.
Spending millions of pounds of public money to send men that are in there 70's & 80's to prison for crimes that were committed 30 years ago & were not investigated at the time seems pointless to me.
Am I the only person that dosent see the point in all this.
Saville,Stuart hall,DLT,Rolf Harris & im sure there are many more offences that were committed many years ago by so called celebs.
Why were these so called offences not reported 20,30 or 40 years ago when the incidents happened.
Why is it that when we live in a day & age when you can't say boo to a goose do all these accusations come out.
When I was a little boy standing in the north stand it was seen as acceptable to make monkey chants to black players,
I would be lying if I said I never joined in,but that was then & this is now.Does that mean that if a retired footballer decides that we was racially abused at the goldstone 30 years ago that the police will investigate & see if we have a case to answer.
What I'm trying to say is what was acceptable 30 years ago may not be now.
Spending millions of pounds of public money to send men that are in there 70's & 80's to prison for crimes that were committed 30 years ago & were not investigated at the time seems pointless to me.
Will he ever be a free man to walk the streets again. I doubt it very much, at his age he will possibly die in prison if he gets another prison sentence or his term is extended, not that that should be a consideration.
If your son/daughter had been interfered with, I think you might have a different opinion.
Justice needs to served, no matter how long it takes.
Why has the BBC been employing so many pedos? it can't just be a coincidence that they've ended up all working for the same company?
Same goes for the queen giving medals to countless amounts of pedos? Even her butler was a pedo!!! Takes one to know one me thinks, they are all linked.
Why do so many paedophiles end up working with children? - the same reason that many worked for the BBC - opportunity
Am I the only person that dosent see the point in all this.
Why do so many paedophiles end up working with children? - the same reason that many worked for the BBC - opportunity
I have a friend who was sexually assaulted by a famous FEMALE BBC children's presenter in the 70's, it wasn't just the men who did it.