Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Steven Gerrard







Redhead

New member
Jul 21, 2005
2,946
The Mighty 'ford
Is the reason that Gerrard gets moved around the midfield more than say Lampard simply because he is more versatile. I still firmly believe Gerrard is THE best English player and although we shouldn't necissarily alter the way we play to accomodate him, he has to play and in my opinion should've been given the armband ahead of Terry.
 


Mellotron

I've asked for soup
Jul 2, 2008
32,479
Brighton
Is the reason that Gerrard gets moved around the midfield more than say Lampard simply because he is more versatile. I still firmly believe Gerrard is THE best English player and although we shouldn't necissarily alter the way we play to accomodate him, he has to play and in my opinion should've been given the armband ahead of Terry.

In a word, no.
 


Rusthall Seagull

New member
Jul 16, 2003
2,119
Tunbridge wells
Is the reason that Gerrard gets moved around the midfield more than say Lampard simply because he is more versatile. I still firmly believe Gerrard is THE best English player and although we shouldn't necissarily alter the way we play to accomodate him, he has to play and in my opinion should've been given the armband ahead of Terry.

In a word, yes
 


One True BHA

New member
Sep 2, 2008
1,769
Is the reason that Gerrard gets moved around the midfield more than say Lampard simply because he is more versatile. I still firmly believe Gerrard is THE best English player and although we shouldn't necissarily alter the way we play to accomodate him, he has to play and in my opinion should've been given the armband ahead of Terry.

Yes.
 




Mellotron

I've asked for soup
Jul 2, 2008
32,479
Brighton
*Shrugs*

No one player HAS TO PLAY. If Gerrard cannot adapt to Capello's way of playing, he doesn't play. It is that simple. This is basic football tactics, come on.
 


One True BHA

New member
Sep 2, 2008
1,769
*Shrugs*

No one player HAS TO PLAY. If Gerrard cannot adapt to Capello's way of playing, he doesn't play. It is that simple. This is basic football tactics, come on.

no, but it would be beneficial for england if capello were to accommodate him. he is, quite simply, our best player.
 


CHAPPERS

DISCO SPENG
Jul 5, 2003
45,097
no, but it would be beneficial for england if capello were to accommodate him..

NO IT f***ing WOULDN'T.

Sorry to 'shout' but we've been trying to accomodate all our 'best' players in the team for years and it hasn't worked. Time to attempt to pick the best TEAM not the best players.
 




Mellotron

I've asked for soup
Jul 2, 2008
32,479
Brighton
Not really.

Capello does not need to accomodate anyone. It's his team, and I trust him more than anyone on this board when it comes to managing football at the top level. He knows better than us. He really does.

Spain won Euro 2008 without Raul, and largely Fabregas. We still have the wrong mindset.

The team should be picked depending on who is needed for THAT specific game. Certain games I would rather Gerrard and Hargreaves, certain other games would suit Lampard and Barry much better. I can see Beckham definitely doing a job coming on with 20 minutes left if we are struggling against certain teams.
 


Mellotron

I've asked for soup
Jul 2, 2008
32,479
Brighton
NO IT f***ing WOULDN'T.

Sorry to 'shout' but we've been trying to accomodate all our 'best' players in the team for years and it hasn't worked. Time to attempt to pick the best TEAM not the best players.

THANK YOU!
 


Scoffers

Well-known member
Jan 13, 2004
6,868
Burgess Hill
Gerrard has only played in his preferred postion for England a handful of times, that has to be important. His issue is that he can play in many positions, so he ends up playing out of his favourite position.
 




keaton

Big heart, hot blood and balls. Big balls
Nov 18, 2004
9,972
NO IT f***ing WOULDN'T.

Sorry to 'shout' but we've been trying to accomodate all our 'best' players in the team for years and it hasn't worked. Time to attempt to pick the best TEAM not the best players.

Too right. Get Jimmy Bullard in there
 


keaton

Big heart, hot blood and balls. Big balls
Nov 18, 2004
9,972
Gerrard has only played in his preferred postion for England a handful of times, that has to be important. His issue is that he can play in many positions, so he ends up playing out of his favourite position.

He's a central midfielder, he's played their countless times
 


Mellotron

I've asked for soup
Jul 2, 2008
32,479
Brighton
Gerrard has only played in his preferred postion for England a handful of times, that has to be important. His issue is that he can play in many positions, so he ends up playing out of his favourite position.

He has played in central midfield plenty of times in his 8-10 odd years for England. When he says "preferred" I'm pretty sure means with the team built around him, to allow him total freedom to roam etc. Admittedly with Barry it does seem to work fairly well. But it's not the case that he has GOT TO PLAY.
 




Les Biehn

GAME OVER
Aug 14, 2005
20,610
My personal opinion is you look at your squad and your best players and then pick a system that suits them. Then the players have to play to the system. If they are top players they should be able to adapt.

So for example I would have a midfield 3;

Hargreaves
Gerrard Lampard​

We know Lampard can play in a 3, he does it for Chelsea. Hargreaves has proved he is an excellent holding player. The problem is Gerrard. He needs to be told the system and that if he doesn't stick to it he is out of the side.
 


CHAPPERS

DISCO SPENG
Jul 5, 2003
45,097
How do we accomodate Cole and Rooney with that midfield three though? Surely we have to stick with the 4-4-2 formation that rolled the Croats over?
 


Mellotron

I've asked for soup
Jul 2, 2008
32,479
Brighton
Don't forget Walcott. And Carrick. And Barry.

We clearly have the players for a good International team. Capello will bring out the right set of players with the right attitude.
 


Les Biehn

GAME OVER
Aug 14, 2005
20,610
I see where you are coming from Chappers. I'm unsure whether a 33 or 42 is best for the squad we have. Still, my point stands that if Gerrard is picked next to Lampard even in a 442 he will have to fit into the system and not go roaming off.
 




Rusthall Seagull

New member
Jul 16, 2003
2,119
Tunbridge wells
He has played in central midfield plenty of times in his 8-10 odd years for England. When he says "preferred" I'm pretty sure means with the team built around him, to allow him total freedom to roam etc. Admittedly with Barry it does seem to work fairly well. But it's not the case that he has GOT TO PLAY.


5 out of 60 odd starts I believe
 


Mendoza

NSC's Most Stalked
Pick the best partnerships in central midfield, central defence and up front and we are good to go. It may not necessarily mean pick the best players.

Partnerships we know that work well for example:

Woodgate/Ferdinand


Barry/Gerrard
Hargreaves/Barry
Heskey/Owen

Crouch/Owen

These partenerships are not the "best" players, but they compliment each other, and do so whilst playing for England, so why not give them a go??

We then get 2 pacy people down the wings and we will be a good team.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here