- Apr 5, 2014
- 25,971
Very nauseous seeing grown blokes mocking how someone looks without being willing to put their mugs up for everyone to judge.We could always make the press conferences be audio only?
Very nauseous seeing grown blokes mocking how someone looks without being willing to put their mugs up for everyone to judge.We could always make the press conferences be audio only?
Heavily backed = always knew that we would not stand in the way of players and predictably sold our £140m centre-mid pairing, but replaced with two hand-picked expensive signings, one a supposed wonder kid from Barcelona (a regular at one of the biggest clubs in the world prior to injury).
Fati certainly wasn’t free. A loan fee was paid - and I can’t imagine that being small - plus enormous wages.Expensive?
Dahoud: Free
Igor: £17m
Fati: free
Yes I think £17m is a lot of money if it were mine, but compared to £200m of sales in the last year, no it isnt.
Fati certainly wasn’t free. A loan fee was paid - and I can’t imagine that being small - plus enormous wages.
They all worked for free? Marvelous bit of business from Tony.Expensive?
Dahoud: Free
Igor: £17m
Fati: free
Yes I think £17m is a lot of money if it were mine, but compared to £200m of sales in the last year, no it isnt.
Nauseous...?Very nauseous seeing grown blokes mocking how someone looks without being willing to put their mugs up for everyone to judge.
Stevie Wonder could have seen we needed 3-4 players.It is difficult to get good value in January.
Even more difficult when the manager tells the world, two days before the transfer window opened, "we need 3-4 players". Things don't get cheaper or easier when other clubs know that the club needs to please this manager and his insatiable desire to get new players to play to death or fall out with.
Anyway, he's history. He will be someone elses problem now.
What is a fact is he wasn't free. Reported we paid around £120k a week in wages. Even if it was less, it's probably closer than your suggestion of "free".Not a known fact, your opinion, which may or may not be right. I have no idea.
Either way, its still not expensive in the insane football world of mega millions
How would the squad have been bloated if for arguments sake we had signed KDH and a right winger? Ttwo positions we desperately needed anyway.Signing players to cover injuries seems like an easy fix, but then those injured players come back and now you have a hopelessly bloated squad and a wage bill beyond what it ought to be.
You can't buy your way out of an injury crisis in the transfer market.
Compare that £200m with the reported £400m (not sourced) TB has put in of his own money. Just because the club sells a player at a profit does not mean the money belongs to the club. It belongs to the owner.Expensive?
Dahoud: Free
Igor: £17m
Fati: free
Yes I think £17m is a lot of money if it were mine, but compared to £200m of sales in the last year, no it isnt.
That's possible and one of many reasons Stevie Wonder won't replace Roberto De Zerbi.Stevie Wonder could have seen we needed 3-4 players.
The injury to Mitoma in Feb was very unfortunate timing, but yes it was clear we needed to strengthen in Jan. But as a gambler TB is very reluctant to gamble.Everyone had injuries of course and we had a chance in Jan to relieve some the pressure. We didn't and the list kept growing.
Were we supposed to kidnap KDH when our offers were allegedly turned down by the club and the player? Seems we did try hard to sign him, we may have tried to sign a winger, who knows?How would the squad have been bloated if for arguments sake we had signed KDH and a right winger? Ttwo positions we desperately needed anyway.
Loving your breast implantsNauseous...?
Anyway, I'M not afraid to post a selfie. Mock away, NSCers...
Hahahaha. @schmunk has really shit hair. And terrible dress sense.Nauseous...?
Anyway, I'M not afraid to post a selfie. Mock away, NSCers...
Should hope so - they cost enough.Loving your breast implants
Exactly. Cooper's name was linked with Burnley last week and he was said to not be interested, but would speak with Leicester. Subsequent links with us definitely wouldn't have leaked from our end and so look very much like his agent advertising his availability 'Look! Brighton are interested! You better move quickly!'This guy was always going to be one of the most likely candidates. But I'd sort of imagine it would be a done deal now if we've decided he's our boy. Unlike a lot of our other probable candidates, Cooper is not waiting for Manchester United and very unlikely would get a better job than with us.
Maybe the gamble was to see what could be done with the cards in his hand.The injury to Mitoma in Feb was very unfortunate timing, but yes it was clear we needed to strengthen in Jan. But as a gambler TB is very reluctant to gamble.
But can a manager only work with the calibre of players in his squad?
I think given his coaching sucess in the England youth set up, with potentially some of the best players in the country for their age group, its a forward thinking appointment.
If its Cooper, I would take finishing position 1-10, you can have 11-20, and shall we say £100 straight wager to either Chestnut Tree House or The Rocking Horse Appeal?
Bottom five you say? How depressing.Exactly. Cooper's name was linked with Burnley last week and he was said to not be interested, but would speak with Leicester. Subsequent links with us definitely wouldn't have leaked from our end and so look very much like his agent advertising his availability 'Look! Brighton are interested! You better move quickly!'
I think he'll end up at one of the Championship promotion contenders. He's proven himself doing that, but his record in the EPL, harsh though it sounds, is one bottom five finish with one of the most expensive squads ever put together by a newly promoted side and sacked the following Christmas when in the same league position.