and the actual wielder of the knife that escaped to bangladesh ? never been seen since, i'm quite sure they could get him if they really wanted, look at all the effort that has gone into the lawrence case.The main difference is surely that 2 members of that gang were successfully convicted for that murder, and the police did a satisfactory job of their enquiries ensuring convictions which were sound and tested at appeal.
The Stephen Lawrence's case is that those 5 gang members should have been convicted in 1993 and would most likely have been if the police had done the same professional job they did for Richard Everitt.
Justice in this country is rapidly regressing back to the dark ages and days of witch hunts, only now it's by using modern communication methods
Was about to make a similar point. From what I remember at the time and from what I've read since I'd say it's pretty likely they did it, but they had absolutely no chance of receiving a fair trial this time around. The evidence is still pretty flimsy and tainted by the OB.
I keep saying it on these type of threads, but welcome to the world of trial by media. Justice in this country is rapidly regressing back to the dark ages and days of witch hunts, only now it's by using modern communication methods
What do you mean " I will"? I am.
and the actual wielder of the knife that escaped to bangladesh ? never been seen since, i'm quite sure they could get him if they really wanted, look at all the effort that has gone into the lawrence case.
and the actual wielder of the knife that escaped to bangladesh ? never been seen since, i'm quite sure they could get him if they really wanted, look at all the effort that has gone into the lawrence case.
No, you bore me full stop, whether you agree with me or not.When people don't agree with you, you get bored? I can only imagine you spend a great deal of your life bored shitless
come on Bushy, trying to find a paki in Bangladesh will be like trying to find a needle in a hay-stack eh?
Where have I defended them ? .
If by fair trial you mean that no one in the jury will have been exposed to the case by a third party then you are living in dream world. It's the 21st century and the outline of pretty much any case can be found with the press of a few buttons on a phone these days. Are you suggesting that anyone in the public eye or a case in the public interest will be thrown out simply because it will be in the media.
Edna posted some insighful words on here a while back, and concluded that sometimes you have to put your faith in people to be objective and deliver the correct verdict.
They found Mustaf Jama in Somalia.come on Bushy, trying to find a paki in Bangladesh will be like trying to find a needle in a hay-stack eh?
if they would have been found not guilty, there would have been riots in teh streets
Do you TRULY not know the answer to that question ?Well you called it a "political show trial" and said the evidence was "tainted beyond belief"
How is that not a defence of these two racist murderers?
They found Mustaf Jama in Somalia.
Suspect snatched in Somali desert jailed for life for killing woman PC | UK news | The Guardian
When people don't agree with you, you get bored? I can only imagine you spend a great deal of your life bored shitless
i never would have guessed i know what you were trying to do, and I am merely showing that if the will is there then they will find a way.I was trying to be funny/ironic in a racist's 'they all look the same' way.