Iggle Piggle
Well-known member
- Sep 3, 2010
- 5,952
Did he give analysis for how many under 15s have passed the virus on to someone else, who has subsequently died?
Thought not...
Have you watched it?
Thought not...
Did he give analysis for how many under 15s have passed the virus on to someone else, who has subsequently died?
Thought not...
Have you watched it?
Thought not...
Yes I saw it when it was broadcast and he clarifies we don't know about infection, he was only talking about deaths...
I've watched it back to check to see what he said .. So as I said, how many people have teenagers passed the virus onto, as the eminent analyst admitted he didn't know!
He was very clear about what he did and didn't know - and refreshingly numbers driven as opposed to politically driven - but I thought his presentation of those numbers provided insight over and above the usual hyperbole as well as highlighting the holes.
- 1% of the total people over 90 in the UK have died of Corona virus. That is an absolutely staggering number (and, as he points out, a risk 10,000 times greater to the virus than someone under the age of 25)
- Just 2 deaths under the age of 15 (and he does point out that of course they can spread it). This is an equally staggeringly low number.
In time, when we've stopped arguing about slogans, it's clear there is a need for some sort of risk based approach. Personally, I don't think the public is ready for a differing approach across regions or age groups and we don't have enough information currently (as he said himself) but there is a argument to be had in future if the vulnerably can be protected and the evidence supports it.
Yes, I thought he was very good.
I guess I am in an unusual situation where we are of an age that would start to be in the risk areas, at 59&60, and my wife is very vulnerable, but have a 3 year old starting school in September. Hence my concerns regards the infection risks...!
Did he give analysis for how many under 15s have passed the virus on to someone else, who has subsequently died?
Thought not...
Here’s President Macron’s new slogan.
As an aside, the statistician on the Marr show yesterday was superb. Want to know how many Under 15's have died in the UK from Coronavirus? 2.
Watch from 46.30.
Sign him up.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/m000j4vd/the-andrew-marr-show-10052020
none apparently, as incredible as it sounds, no reported case of a child passing the infection on, when going through contract tracing.
I guess, therein lies the problem of one size fits all solutions. Kids going back to school is low risk if you are in your 40s and staying away from over 75s but how do you do it if in your case where your wife is vulnerable? No easy answers obviously as if the schools open you have the unenviable choice of protecting your wife or your youngest missing thier 1st term.
Personally, I'd like to see the government using the data to try and make the right decisions instead of trying to make the right political one which will end in tears.
He spent 3 minutes explaining alerts, and how they will drive decision making. He then mentioned the slogan once. As I have noted elsewhere, the slogan was surely an error, something invented by an aid who misunderstood a conversation, and the slogan was then approved without due consideration by a careless executive.
Boris has contradicted himself on other issues today.
I fear the captain is now an empty suit.
It is funny how a simple mistake can be blown out of all proportion when you throw in a good dose of incompetence.
I must tell you one day, how I ended up inheriting offshore development teams in both Serbia and Siberia (true story !)
none apparently, as incredible as it sounds, no reported case of a child passing the infection on, when going through contract tracing.
Where did you read this?
It's not as conclusive as that........it's how one study (based on contact tracing in China) was reported
https://fullfact.org/health/children-transmitting-coronavirus/
Well done, Sir Humphrey.