HangletonGull
Well-known member
- Apr 10, 2023
- 2,392
Starmer proper choked that
In the context of the format they both had to work with, he was head and shoulders ahead of Starmer.I hate him but Sunak won that. Be interesting to see if it makes any difference.
Bedrooms in their Mansion/Penthouse/estate/whatever that billionaire family want to buy wherever they want to buy it.? Their what?
It won’t - most people already know Starmer is a wooden block of weirdness, but there is no way the Tories aren’t getting slaughtered. The fun will come after the election when absolutely nothing changesI hate him but Sunak won that. Be interesting to see if it makes any difference.
Being objective both were crap but Starmer more so.Trying to be objective - Sunak probably won the first half, Starmer the second. But this is a format that is fundamentally flawed - serious issues reduced to a quick shouty soundbite.
But Starmer is the QC? You’d shit yourself if he was the one defending youIn the context of the format they both had to work with, he was head and shoulders ahead of Starmer.
Like an aggressive courtroom lawyer being told to stop by the judge, he just kept going to ensure the "jury" got to hear his point.
Starmer reminds me a bit of potter.I wonder what a TV debate between Potter and RDZ about who was the best Brighton manager would look like?
Yes so let’s have 5 more years of lying self serving *unts instead.Starmer is a fraud, no plan whatsoever
KCs generally get longer than 45 seconds to make their case, and don’t have someone heckling and making shit up shouting them downBut Starmer is the QC? You’d shit yourself if he was the one defending you
Starmer just wasn't strong enoughApparently Sunak is refusing to do the Sky News leaders thing in Grimsby unless he can be on the stage with Starmer when he’s answering questions, presumably tonight we saw why as he’s only interested in shouting Starmer down and not letting him answer.