darkwolf666
Well-known member
That's the problem though, a government DID interfere with the housing problem by selling off all the council houses and refusing to allow councils to build new houses.In my defence, I was just trying to find a like for like example! I think we're talking about two different issues here - One being the problem with shortage of housing which is a real and critical issue. The other, the ability for people to buy their homes is more of an aspirational and political issue and the problem here is that one's opinion will differ according to where you are on the 'property ladder' (I hate that term SO much). At one end of the scale, if you're not on it you're hoping that prices drop significantly - At the other end (I am) mortgage free, have several properties, you're going to have a slightly different outlook. In any case, I just don't see what any government can do to materially interfere with the market, after all, that's what it is, a market where people buy and sell and prices reflect supply and demand.
For me, I'd wholeheartedly support changes to support renters that make renting affordable and gives those who require it, stability - I say that as someone that was stuffed for £10k or so buy some charlatan tenant a couple of years back....
Anyway, good luck in finding the home of your dreams!
That was the catalyst for the problems we find ourselves in now.
Not everyone wants to own their own home and as you have said previously there are advantages to renting, but there is no stability and as a tenant could be out on your ear with a couple of months notice - how can that ever be considered home?