Spun Cuppa
Thanks Greens :(
The club do lose a lot of money paying the travel companies, this switch will not make the club any money at all, just slightly reduce the loss
Could you furnish us with the figures please?
The club do lose a lot of money paying the travel companies, this switch will not make the club any money at all, just slightly reduce the loss
Could you furnish us with the figures please?
This. We're either all in together or not at all. I'd support scrapping the transport levy rather than an weird two tier system.
Could you furnish us with the figures please?
If you want to play with the big boys you have to spend a bit extra with the pocket money.
Once we get to play with the big boys, then I'm out anyway. It's getting too expensive nowadays.
The cost of the travel to the club is in the accounts, I haven't got the figures to hand. It was about a million as other FM quoted earlier in this thread.
Do you really believe the club make profit out of the travel subsidy?
You're going to be waiting a long time. He deals with patronising platitudes rather than fact.
If you want to play with the big boys you have to spend a bit extra with the pocket money.
The cost of the travel to the club is in the accounts, I haven't got the figures to hand. It was about a million as other FM quoted earlier in this thread.
Do you really believe the club make profit out of the travel subsidy?
How about instead of being paid, for example, £10,000 a week they get paid £9,620 a week. Then they will have covered the cost of 80 people on a coach and I doubt they would even ****ing notice!
The cost of the travel to the club is in the accounts, I haven't got the figures to hand. It was about a million as other FM quoted earlier in this thread.
Do you really believe the club make profit out of the travel subsidy?
One million divided by say 17000, to allow for full-price and concessionary ST's, comes out at £59 each. So even if the actual cost is closer to £1.5 million, it would come in at under £90 for each ST. On that basis, with the extra money they would take in, I would say that the club would more than recoup the travel cost outlay, plus a wee bit over
As a transport operator, with some knowledge of the cost of running buses (and hiring in other companies to run them), I've been giving some thought to this question.The club do lose a lot of money paying the travel companies, this switch will not make the club any money at all, just slightly reduce the loss
Why not just abandon the transport levy? You now can't park anywhere near the Amex unless you are 1901 or pay for the uni or the Bridge car park. No dropping off should be easily enforceable on the A27. So what's the problem? Other than walking or cycling you can only realistically get there by train, bus, coach or park and ride. Drop the levy (which is an unfair tax as everyone pays it, not everyone benefits from it) and then everyone just pays the actual fare/fee for the mode of travel they use.
It was more of a comparison to playing League 1/League 2 at Withdean and playing in The Championship at The Amex. Staying within the FFP guidelines will still cost a fortune.Thats not what FFP is about though is it, you are supposed to play within your means not screw your fans for extra money so you can risk buying some players in the hope of promotion to be able to screw your fans some more.
In fact all the cost cutting to make FFP work and the hints of a cheaper younger squad despite having a debt free brand new stadium is going to mean further cutting if attendances drop
I think one of the problems with this is the huge numbers travelling by train. They wouldn't want the crowding at the ticket booths/gates as people go through the barriers etc.