blue-shifted
Banned
FA can't afford to sack him. They've lost loads of matchday income as well remember. So this whole conversation is redundant
Okay now please show us all the teams we have beaten the lucky win in spain and the sweden win at the world cup the only two impressive wins I remember. It wouldn't be harsh it would be necessary he's useless.
As opposed to all the previous England managers with tournament success and multiple wins against the best sides in the world? Who are you kidding. The brutal fact of the matter is we build up our 'world class' stars when actually they're not. We still aren't producing technical ability at the very highest level that wins you tournaments.
Southgate brings continuity from being involved in England's development sides, and that in turn has led to a lot of looking at youth. He's probably given more debuts than previous England managers too, and in some respects that is no bad thing.
The other question is who is in the succession plan? Serial winners like Germany have a plan in place, I'm not seeing any obvious candidates unless you spunk a shit load of money on a big name for yet more disappointment and failure to connect with what playing for England is about.
Southgate's record against other FIFA Top 20 countries is P20 W7 D6 L7.
We've beaten Spain and the Dutch away from home, Croatia, Sweden, Colombia and the Swiss twice.
During his four years in charge he's been blessed with Harry Kane and - more recently - a maturing Raheem Sterling, but by England player standards since 66 I wouldn't say the squads have been particular strong - certainly no where near the quality that Sven had to work with.
His record against teams outside of the FIFA Top 20 has been exceptional P23 W18 D4 L1, so he has earned the right to be given time to come up with a plan for the Euros next year.
I believe TAA, Chilwell, Maguire, Henderson, Kane and Sterling are shoe-ins for the Euro Starting XI so he needs to find a keeper, 1 or 2 CBs, some creativity in midfield and he needs to get a front 3 that can play together. He also needs to clamp down on the lack of discipline. Personally, I think Pope, Dunk, Coady, Mount, Grealish and Rashford are those players.
winning any tournament requires a good squad with key players and a manager with a very good plan. We have never had that. We currently have 2/3 of those requirements in place..
Southgate is a massive reason why this team will achieve nothing.
I recall the players rebelling against Capello's strict regime in South Africa, and we had a poor World Cup. Now we have Southgate it has gone the other way, with the players taking the piss. What hope is there for whoever taken on the job?
Who is your choice for a “manger with a very good plan” who will single-handed change everything?
But it's clearly NOT better than Portugal or else it would've won something! It's like revisiting the whole 'golden generation' nonsense from the early 2000s or hyping up the 1996 lot – just because people keep saying the squad is good enough and you believe it, doesn't mean that it actually IS...
All this talk of potential and talent pools is just that – all talk.
Who is your choice for a “manger with a very good plan” who will single-handed change everything?
Okay now please show us all the teams we have beaten the lucky win in spain and the sweden win at the world cup the only two impressive wins I remember. It wouldn't be harsh it would be necessary he's useless.
I’m sorry but to say we were lucky against Spain is bollocks - we were superb that night, result was 3-2 but that flattered the Spanish massively.
My dog would come up with a better plan than southgate parking the bus with 5 at the back and 3 defensive midfielders against Denmark. Honestly name whoever you want.. Dyche, Gerrard, Howe, Wilder, Hughton would take them all over the current donkey.
You seem to have a slightly irrational dislike of him. I'm not saying he's brilliant by any stretch, but he has been better than many England managers, and many others would do a lot worse.
What England have always lacked, and it stems from our domestic game, is ball retention. The international game simply doesn't replicate anything like the football in our leagues, whereas Bundesliga, La Liga etc. it is more reflective of that careful attention to keeping the ball. The cut and thrust of those players you mention before, your Trent's, Stirling's etc. they're simply not as effective in internationals because when you lose the ball, you don't get it straight back like your Liverpool's and Man City's do. This was more than evident in the WC semi. No manager can get us round that I don't think, not until the PL changes and don't see that anytime soon.
It could be argued that Brighton & Hove Albion are partially responsible for Southgate's stagnation.
Southgate and Dan Ashworth had a clear programme of England's immediate and medium-term future mapped out. Now with Ashworth down here, there is possibly an element of Clough without Taylor - he can't function anything like as well without him.
The columbia match lets face it was a draw.. Sweden was an impressive win but we should be beating them comfortably on paper. The only other win that really was impressive was the spain one. Dutch were still finding their feet, Croatia were still riding the high of beating us in the world cup semi didn't look bothered at all. Switzerland how are they even in the top 20?! The other teams me and you could probably get wins against managing that England side.
We'll agree to disagree but I would much rather he left before he has a chance to destroy the potential. You mention Dunk, Pope, Grealish three players who were probably the best 3 players in their positions in the whole bottom half of the prem last season.. Southgate is alienating them so he can keep picking the same old flops.