yxee
Well-known member
What a total mess.
That's nice to know.
Are you a commuter?
So if you are a commuter, as long as the trains run on time, you are prepared for these people to be treated badly and/or lose their jobs?
Must be other ways to totally stuff Southern up without constantly messing with peoples life's .
Agree with the strikes BTW but they've lost so much support for this from what I hear on trains etc
So if you are a commuter, as long as the trains run on time, you are prepared for these people to be treated badly and/or lose their jobs?
That's a very forward statement from a fellow lower west stander if I may say so! lol
I'm past caring tbh.
I can see arguments for both sides and am fed up of being caught in the middle of a political spat.
I don't think either the government or unions give a stuff about us - we're just the punters.
So if you are a commuter, as long as the trains run on time, you are prepared for these people to be treated badly and/or lose their jobs?
the strike isn't over being mistreated or losing jobs though. if anything they are being asked to do less.
i know full well that the longer term objective is to lose the jobs through natural losses, but the union is making no real case to ensure that doesn't happen, just battling over the role change.
I'm past caring tbh.
I can see arguments for both sides and am fed up of being caught in the middle of a political spat.
I don't think either the government or unions give a stuff about us - we're just the punters.
You keep coming out with the same rubbish
So if you are a commuter, as long as the trains run on time, you are prepared for these people to be treated badly and/or lose their jobs?
That's a very forward statement from a fellow lower west stander if I may say so! lol
which part? please correct me as far as i'm aware that is the current state of the dispute. are jobs going imminently or is there another aspect to the dispute that im overlooking?
That's nice to know.
Are you a commuter?
Pretty much everything you say. Are you sure you don't work for daft?
A horrible thing to do maybe, but ultimately I would have thought that getting into commuters faces and making their journies as difficult as possible, or even IMpossible,would have the greatest effect, and possibly force Govia's, or the governments hand.
Well that's worked well so far ...... not ! This a fight between the unions, TOCs and government and not one of them gives a single toss about the customers caught in the middle. It's like we've rolled back to the 70s.
which part? please correct me as far as i'm aware that is the current state of the dispute. are jobs going imminently or is there another aspect to the dispute that im overlooking?
the strike isn't over being mistreated or losing jobs though. if anything they are being asked to do less.
i know full well that the longer term objective is to lose the jobs through natural losses, but the union is making no real case to ensure that doesn't happen, just battling over the role change.
again, please correct me. i understand the dispute is about GTR's wish to end Driver and Conductor Operation and extend Driver Only Operation to all services. what else have i said its about? or what else have i missed?
i was only challenging the misrepresentation of the dispute as relating to poor treatment and job losses. the RMT dont mention either of these issues.