Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
[tweet]783660159092551680[/tweet]
[tweet]783660159092551680[/tweet]
you post hundreds of twitter links. which no one on tapatalk can view.
Any chance in future you can give brief out line and if worth accessing via browser to see.
New depths plumbed by this toxic franchise on my train tonight. They'd rigged the in-carriage display unit to say that 'Due to a strike by the ticket inspectors and the RMT on 11-13 October blah blah considerable inconvenience blah blah for more info see the Southern website'. Presumably Southern's PR intention was that anyone seeing that message was supposed to give the 'ticket inspector' an earful of abuse. Another example of these nasty fvckers trying to set the travelling public against their own hard-working front line staff. Pathetically tho, the preceding bit of the in-carriage message said that we were 'now approaching Preston Park' when in fact we were now approaching Burgess Hill going in the opposite direction. Total wankers.
Southern reject RMT offer of new package that could solve the guards dispute...
Presumably that is only half of the story.
Have the sackings begun yet?
Absolute jokers, classic union trying to strangle the country as they have in France for hundreds of years.
The way I see it is that of or when southern have the franchise withdrawn the new holder can just implement the proposed changes immediately. The sooner that happens the better
Note to editors:
The full detail of RMT’s proposals is as below:
PROPOSALS
1. Recognising the company’s objective to move its implementation plans along, the RMT accepts that on an agreed date conductors will migrate to a new role of On Board Supervisor (OBS).
2. Recognising the RMT’s objective of retaining a second safety critical competent person on each service where it is currently required, Southern (GTR) accepts that for a defined transition period (to be agreed) the OBS role and post-holders on such services will retain all of the current competencies and requirements of a conductor and that those services will operate in the current mode, with a second safety critical and competent OBS on board all services throughout the transition period.
3. During the transition period Southern (GTR) will work jointly with RMT and representatives of train drivers to create a new set of operational processes and procedures that will be acceptable to all parties with the remit:
• That those services that currently require a conductor will retain a second safety critical and competent OBS on each service that runs.
• That the two train crew will jointly operate the service in a safe, efficient and reliable mode.
• The role and competencies will encompass the customer service objectives of Southern (GTR).
• That high levels of accessibility for all passengers including disabled, elderly, and all those that may need assistance or guidance, accessibility is a priority
4. Building on the work previously done at ACAS, a set of defined competencies will be jointly devised and agreed to enable OBS post-holders to operate trains in the new agreed mode.
5. Both parties agree that the adoption of these proposals will enable them to finalise by an agreed date the migration of conductors to the OBS role, on a jointly agreed programme and set of arrangements. These arrangements will be developed from those that have already been tabled and will ensure fairness in terms of which staff will migrate and which will remain as conductors
in other words the RMT will move to OBS on condition all services retain second safety critical person, with no recognition of possible exceptions. so they'll go ahead with the strikes, because they cant compromise on one point, having secured so much along the way. so sad.
in other words the RMT will move to OBS on condition all services retain second safety critical person, with no recognition of possible exceptions. so they'll go ahead with the strikes, because they cant compromise on one point, having secured so much along the way. so sad.
That's how I read it as well. I was pretty sympathetic to a lot of the staff concerns, but for me that's now draining away. Still hate SASTA as well though.
Copied from "It's not about the doors"
Passenger Account of Watford Junction Train Derailment, 16/09/16
It’s not about the doors! It’s not about who pushes a button!
We have been sent this by a passenger who was travelling on the derailed 06:19 hrs service from Milton Keynes to London Euston on 16th September 2016. The train was comprised of two four-coach class 350 electric multiple units, a total of eight coaches.
While you may have seen the incident in the newspapers and on television what was not reported was that the driver of this train was trapped in the cab and the guard took over safety critical duties and train evacuation. We sat on this for a while with the hope our union would make something of this. Hopefully they will in the very near future. We will add more to this as soon as we can.
The passenger states:
“The guard on the train after the derailment was amazing. She kept us inform via loudspeaker of all the different updates all the time (we were never left in the dark about what was happening, how far was the rescue train from us, etc.), first she told us they were going to evacuate us, then that they were going to move the people in the first 4 carriages on the last 4 and move the train out but as this was impossible and we’ll have to wait for a rescue train. When the emergency lights went off after a couple of hours and all the carriages went dark, she explained to us the reason why apart from updating us via loudspeakers, she walked up and down all the carriages few times, asking if people were alright, she then left opened all the inter-carriages connection doors as well as the outside doors to let some fresh air circulate in the all train She liaised with the firemen, paramedics and British Transport Police when they arrived And she also kept us all smiling by finishing all her messages by ‘Keep Calm’ … Being on a derailment train made me realise how important the guard is while before I may not have pay much attention to the role of the guard.”
Not trolling, but would a driver not be able to do this? Or was he trying to put the train back on the tracks?
Incidentally just had this trotted out whilst stopped at a red signal for 5 mins, the conductor came on the tannoy and said, due to a DOO service in front of us having a passenger alarm the driver has had to get out of his cabin and go up the train to investigate. Oooff
absolutly. this isnt an either-or issue, they are both a shower of crap.
I have not followed everything on here, and do not claim to be an expert in any way, but could not a solution be that the driver presses the button, as he can see with his mirror, or look down the platform much as a conductor can, and a second member of staff is always on board (ie no job losses) and concerns him/herself solely with the passengers. Is this too simple?