Basil Fawlty
Don't Mention The War
I think Wilkins will keep the same side what beat Orient on Saturday, I can't see any changes happening.
Last edited:
Not sure I'd want to throw him in against Jamal Campbell-Ryce though.Les Biehn said:Would be nice to see Rents get another run out.
Silent Bob said:Not sure I'd want to throw him in against Jamal Campbell-Ryce though.
Oh yeah...much better to stick with Mayo
Silent Bob said:Not sure I'd want to throw him in against Jamal Campbell-Ryce though.
-----------Kuipers-------
Reid--El-Abd--Lynch--Mayo
Hart--Fraser--Hammond--Cox
-------Robinson--Revell------
Subs:
Sullivan
Butters
Rents
Chamberlain
Frutos
Turkey said:Santos is a slight doubt, could be replaced by Fraser.
Repugnant Toad said:Not sure about moving Reid after his fantastic game on Saturday ... can't imagine he'll be best pleased either, but still ...
Would have gone with Rents as well, but otherwise, it's about right.
algie said:There really are some idiots on here.Kuipers has done nothing wrong so deserves the shirt for the time being.So drop him for Hendo who doesn't want to play for the club.Some real logic there.Lets feel sorry for Wayne because he has missed a couple of games.
the right footed denilson said:why do always move reid around!!?!?!
Dont disagree, just responding to the commentby the poster aboveFragmented Badger said:Oh right, sorry. I didn't go to the Boston game, so wasn't arguing with you, just genuinely wondering if he made a mistake. I guess the difference is Henderson has had games not that long ago and has now decided he wants to leave. WHY should we give him a game? At the time of the Boston game, Michel was number 2, without an appearance to his name, and in need of some match fitness. It made a lot more sense to play him that night than it would the Irishman tonight.