Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

So, over 700 dead......









rogersix

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2014
8,202
The thing is, he could force us to accept his love but does forcing come from a place of love?



Hmm you see, I believe that there is a purpose but if it's God's purpose then my interpretation is probably pretty basic. My version is something like this. We were made in his image which for me is that we once were "like" God, I mean had his attributes like unconditional love etc. and didn't even know what things outside love were, like anger, hate etc. We were amazing, so amazing we wanted to go and do our own thing. However God (obviously) knew what would happen. It wouldn't take us long to create a mess. So we were given a "homing beacon", some part of us that knows where home is and would long to get there. We then had many many experiences but in the course of this we dirtied ourselves, turned away and covered that part of ourselves, that homing beacon that is protected from us damaging it.

Ultimately what we need to do is just accept God's love completely and utterly. The trouble is parts of us don't want to. However one day we will and we will then choose to return and all our suffering and pain will be over.

Now God could force us to accept his love but then what would happen? It wouldn't have been our choice so we would soon want to leave again.

i would not reject being forced into a life without anything negative, why would you?
 








rogersix

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2014
8,202
i didnt claim there were rules, you infered it. for a God to allow pain and suffering, then expect others to counter that, seems like a game to me. your God is a petty and malicious one so far, love me or suffer seems to be the message. you want to claim "we" create all the badness, i dont see what anyone has done to create the afflicted child's condition. as above, this gives us far too much power. unless you are refering to original sin, in which case you are saying all the ills of the world are on someones actions 8000 (or what ever) years ago. thats a vindictive God you have there.

thanks for having a go, ultimately your God is powerless and malevolent, despite the claim of wanting to love us. this is clearly a fundemental contradiction, ergo, it does not exist. maybe try another definition.

i think you're pretty much on the ball fellah, but could i ever so humbly suggest the phrase passive aggressive?
 


One Love

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2011
4,488
Brighton
who is it that's demanding to go out and experience "being"? your story is contrived to fit the conclusion, not starting from a real position.

even if a few did, why apply it wholesale to everyone, when you could allow those that want this to go on their merry way, while protecting those accepting a life free of suffering. and then why suffering outside of mankind, is that for our benefit too? I'd like you to ask yourself seriously, why does your God want a mother who's done nothing wrong in life to give birth to a deformed child. who is this suffering in aid of: the mother, the child, the rest of mankind?

My story was like a parable as I assume you know.

I've tried to translate spiritual matters to the level of your brain which you still refuse to understand. I'll give up which I think was probably your intention in the first place anyway.
 


One Love

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2011
4,488
Brighton
You know you could have saved yourself 10 years of meditation and just watched a few Russell Brand Youtubes and some Beatles interviews from the late '60's to come to the same 6th form humanities studies conclusion.

Nibble trying to take the intellectual high ground :)
 




rogersix

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2014
8,202
Oh dear, I did wonder how long the conversation would take for you to descend into that :(

The problem seems to be that your "God" you give human characteristics and attributes.

he is human, so he can only comprehend the universe through the human "prism". love is a human emotion or attribute. god is love.
 




rogersix

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2014
8,202
The thing is you can have the greatest power in existence but if you disconnect yourself from it then the only other alternative is for God to wield that power. Would you accept God's power and be happy about it? The thing is "power" has negative connotations to us for obvious reasons. God's power, with no negativity attached to it, is love.

Let's hope that man eventually realises that we have made a monumental mess of things and starts treating each other with love and respect, then we may not destroy each other altogether :(

we can only live in harmony when the vast majority realise that there is no "overlord", we are all we've got
 




rogersix

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2014
8,202
Why do people need to argue about God? Aren't people allowed to choose what to believe anymore?

because religious folk sometimes make some REALLY bad decisions directly stemming from their faith, and then sensible people have to clear up the mess
 








rogersix

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2014
8,202
It seems unless you're atheist. People will want to challenge your inner faith until.....Well it never ends.

If an athiest is so content about their faith in coincidence. Why do they feel so strongly about arguing with people who have faith in spirituality?

all the resultant death is one thing
 




rogersix

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2014
8,202
I can understand how experiences like that would make you question certain things about religion. There's no harm choosing not to believe. I myself spent a large part of my life questioning religion and God. None of it seemed to make sense other than the 'be nice' bits. I still think its madness that people fight in the name of God and I too would never join a religion. God to me is a personal thing. If I walk past a car crash or hear of a disaster somewhere on the other side of the world, I'll ask God to help them. I don't see the harm?

because medecine, food, blankets, tents, and helicopters would help a lot more
 








rogersix

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2014
8,202
Right, I take your point, If only it were that simple.

The "celestial" forgiveness would not absolve you from responsibility in the immediate surroundings on earth.

And secondly, on the saying you're sorry partfor the other-worldly bit, you have to mean it, be believed and even then it might not work.

Having said that, this is not an area that takes up a great deal of my thought. You have to "do things right" down here, and that is whether it is going to war with Iraq or stealing an OAP's purse.

is that war immoral in you opinion?
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here