Saint Lennard
Prawn Sarnie Casual
Firstly, We've all worked with people who love the sound of their own voice, let us know how they are great at everything, who moan about their job/situation and are full of idle threats to leave. With these people after a while you become accustomed to this noise and just take all their comments as a pinch of salt. I have worked with people who have told me they are resigning but when it comes to that there is nothing to go to they back out which has led me to now wait until I see something in writing before doing anything...and then after that some have withdrawn it when they reflect that the grass is nit so greener elsewhere. So why not a similar scenario here?
Secondly, with this in mind and seeing as we were on the up at the time of all this and the season was coming towards a positive conclusion why would chairman leave us in a position where we were manager less. It may have been considered that a manager who knew his team, the opposition and knew how things worked here but was demotivated may have seemed a better and cheaper alternative than starting afresh. If this failed then decisions could be made at the end of the season.
I find it difficult to believe that some think that clubs and managers are so honourable. I believe one f the reasons we said no to Gus is that at such a critical stage we had no one lined up to continue our progress. I also believe that clubs who are about to change and agents of managers do most of the damage behind the scenes and that characters like Gus who seem to have certain ambitions are easy bait for these people. If we were unprepared for this i could see, but not necessarily agree, that we were not willing to play despite the risks involved. It's less of a problem if you end up promoted but manager less.
Secondly, with this in mind and seeing as we were on the up at the time of all this and the season was coming towards a positive conclusion why would chairman leave us in a position where we were manager less. It may have been considered that a manager who knew his team, the opposition and knew how things worked here but was demotivated may have seemed a better and cheaper alternative than starting afresh. If this failed then decisions could be made at the end of the season.
I find it difficult to believe that some think that clubs and managers are so honourable. I believe one f the reasons we said no to Gus is that at such a critical stage we had no one lined up to continue our progress. I also believe that clubs who are about to change and agents of managers do most of the damage behind the scenes and that characters like Gus who seem to have certain ambitions are easy bait for these people. If we were unprepared for this i could see, but not necessarily agree, that we were not willing to play despite the risks involved. It's less of a problem if you end up promoted but manager less.