pocketseagull
Well-known member
- Dec 29, 2014
- 1,360
So the plan is to have a functioning asylum system that processes claims in a timely fashion instead of the mess we've got now.
As with all ideas and plans, the proof of the pudding is in the eating.So the plan is to have a functioning asylum system that processes claims in a timely fashion instead of the mess we've got now.
OK and good.The Times
Instead, Labour plans to speed up the rate at which asylum claims are decided and to strike return agreements with other countries.
Do you think that the system can cope with figures that we currently see, or do you fear a backlog might build?So the plan is to have a functioning asylum system that processes claims in a timely fashion instead of the mess we've got now.
To be honest Harry, whilst (like you) I welcome any attempt to solve this issue in a humane and organised manner, I can’t believe for one minute that there are any ‘return agreements’ to be struck with any countries at all. I wonder if there are any such agreements anywhere already in place? I would file that part of the statement along with the £140billion green spending plan.Coupled with other measures, engaging with other countries.
So the plan is to have a functioning asylum system that processes claims in a timely fashion instead of the mess we've got now.
It used to work in 'real life'. Why would it not work again?As with all ideas and plans, the proof of the pudding is in the eating.
Let's see how it works in 'real life'.
Have you responded in relation to the figures above regarding the daily boats?It used to work in 'real life'. Why would it not work again?
There are currently no safe and legal routes to travel to Britain to claim asylum - Priti Patel closed the last of them down.Have you responded in relation to the figures above regarding the daily boats?
What have we 'coped' with this before?
I'd love to join in the convo, but I have potty on ignore for repeated offenses against logic, reason and honesty. And punctuation? Yes, and punctuation.It used to work in 'real life'. Why would it not work again?
I salute your indefatigability.There are currently no safe and legal routes to travel to Britain to claim asylum - Priti Patel closed the last of them down.
We only have the increase in boats because we stopped the previously functioning legal asylum processes.
Not QUITE my question but as I expected.There are currently no safe and legal routes to travel to Britain to claim asylum - Priti Patel closed the last of them down.
We only have the increase in boats because we stopped the previously functioning legal asylum processes.
Ooh, you'll like this from them then: "What have we 'coped' with this before?"I'd love to join in the convo, but I have potty on ignore for repeated offenses against logic, reason and honesty. And punctuation? Yes, and punctuation.
I bet you get an 'ironic' thumbs up from potty for thatOoh, you'll like this from them then: "What have we 'coped' with this before?"
OKNot QUITE my question but as I expected.
We'll see, Starmer will have it sorted by Christmas no doubt.
Vacuous sniping; it’s his modus operandi.View attachment 181782
@Is it PotG? - why the 'ha-ha' emoji? What's funny about facts and figures from the House of Commons own stats?
he has nothing elseView attachment 181782
@Is it PotG? - why the 'ha-ha' emoji? What's funny about facts and figures from the House of Commons own stats?
He does this to be 'ironic'.View attachment 181782
@Is it PotG? - why the 'ha-ha' emoji? What's funny about facts and figures from the House of Commons own stats?