sir albion
New member
No room for chaviness so NO,he can have a plaque instead
I'm not sure what is going on with the naming of the stands but I feel quite strongly that DK should have one of them named after him.
I'm noticing more and more a tendency for fans on here to go down the Dick Tight potless pillock route when comparing him to TB.
I really hope his part in our survival does not become diluted in fans minds, especially the ones who were not old enough to know what was going on, or perhaps not even born when he took over.
He was not perfect and he may have held on too long, who knows, but imo we would quite likely not have a club in it's current state if he had not taken on what was undoubtably a poisoned chalice back in the 90's
Whaddya reckon??
No. It has a commercial value in naming rights, and the Club should continue getting every penny that it can from the stadium.
Remember when Dick Knight used to stand in the Northstand at the Goldstone so naming the Northstand at the Amex would be a fitting tribute. It does not have to cover any advertising boardings.
I'm not sure what is going on with the naming of the stands but I feel quite strongly that DK should have one of them named after him.
I'm noticing more and more a tendency for fans on here to go down the Dick Tight potless pillock route when comparing him to TB.
I really hope his part in our survival does not become diluted in fans minds, especially the ones who were not old enough to know what was going on, or perhaps not even born when he took over.
He was not perfect and he may have held on too long, who knows, but imo we would quite likely not have a club in it's current state if he had not taken on what was undoubtably a poisoned chalice back in the 90's
Whaddya reckon??
As mentioned before; Dick, and other quieter Board members and/or shareholders lent the club interest-free EACH between several hundred thousand and low £m's,
with a remote chance of ever getting it back, with no freehold or assets to secure it on, and being a large chunk of their personal wealths.
Their monies kept the club alive, paid for several £m on planning/architects/appeals and some palyers. This is all recorded in the Accounts.
They had no mega money, and until Falmer was really going to happen, no one wanted to takeover.
Dick and the others, and now TB in a different era, have ALL been fantastic for the club.
NO............I am sure the quite modest DK really would not want the lime light and as a true fan would prefer to get more revenue for our club to build us into the biggest and best club we can.
Disagree. The club may be a cash cow going forward. But it should honour those whose commitment made it possible. In fact there should be a Dick Knight Stand, a Tony Bloom Stand and an Albion Fans stand. Oh, and an Away Fans Stand.
What about a Fatboy slim stand a Charlie Webb a Peter Ward and so on. I really feel if you are a true Albion Fan and have helped the club through the mire you will just be happy for a seat and a beer and watching our club week in and out.
Infact as DK has so quitely taken the back seat i am sure he would be happy to continue that position.
I really feel if you are a true Albion Fan and have helped the club through the mire you will just be happy for a seat and a beer and watching our club week in and out.
That's EXACTLY what I'm happy for.
But at the same time there's three non-away-end stands up for naming. And nobody other than 1. Albion Fans 2. Dick Knight 3. Tony Bloom that comes within several hundred country miles worthy of naming them after. IMHO, like.