Pavilionaire
Well-known member
- Jul 7, 2003
- 31,265
- Thread starter
- #41
Bridcutt's motives are immaterial because he was always going to be sold. The question is whether it was an economic necessity to sell him or not.
If it wasn't then why did we end up weaker at the end of the January window?
If it was it makes it likely we'll have to sell again in order to FFP comply for 2014/15, which brings me back to my original point about Ulloa.
I don't see how you can build a team around Ulloa when you have to address PIG out of contract, three of the back four well into their thirties and a lack of pace and creativity in midfield. If we want to compete in 2014/15 I don't see that we have any choice but to sell Ulloa to reinvest some of the proceeds in 3 or 4 decent players.
If it wasn't then why did we end up weaker at the end of the January window?
If it was it makes it likely we'll have to sell again in order to FFP comply for 2014/15, which brings me back to my original point about Ulloa.
I don't see how you can build a team around Ulloa when you have to address PIG out of contract, three of the back four well into their thirties and a lack of pace and creativity in midfield. If we want to compete in 2014/15 I don't see that we have any choice but to sell Ulloa to reinvest some of the proceeds in 3 or 4 decent players.