Two Professors
Two Mad Professors
There's no wisdom in getting lost on your way back from the shops.
That's what grandchildren are for-to guide us back!
There's no wisdom in getting lost on your way back from the shops.
There's no wisdom in getting lost on your way back from the shops.
Surely the less time you have to live with the consequences, the less your vote should count. For every 10 years you've been on this planet (and others), your vote should be weighted less 20%.
Age
18-30 100% weighted vote
30-40 80%
40-50 60%
50-60 40%
50-60 20%
60-70 10%
80+ You've had your time and in 7 years time when the shite really hits the fan you'll statistically be tied to a television.
Just a thought, eh.
At least my vote actually counts this time..... whatever way i decide !
So don't dilute it !
And got rich out of it. Then decided that they should charge the next generations for an education, made rent unaffordable and then have the audacity to call us all workshy and lazy.
They ruined the country.
perhaps there is a substitute for experience.
Strange the post war generation, who had suffered much deprivation in the fifties, managed to forge a life of full employment, good wages, buy houses in their twenties etc. This was done by a good education and hard work. And no, the younger generation are not supporting the seniors.They paid their dues and taxes all their working lives.
All the EU years has given younger generations is further education you have to pay for, longer working hours, no chance of a mortgage until you are heading for middle age, loss of manufacturing jobs etc. Unless you are an unelected, perked up EU employed leech of course.
No idea why anybody would want to remain.
Can't see why you are so enthralled into remaining.
Strange the post war generation, who had suffered much deprivation in the fifties, managed to forge a life of full employment, good wages, buy houses in their twenties etc. This was done by a good education and hard work. And no, the younger generation are not supporting the seniors.They paid their dues and taxes all their working lives.
All the EU years has given younger generations is further education you have to pay for, longer working hours, no chance of a mortgage until you are heading for middle age, loss of manufacturing jobs etc. Unless you are an unelected, perked up EU employed leech of course.
No idea why anybody would want to remain.
Can't see why you are so enthralled into remaining.
If it was to be weighted, it should be done the other way round! If I was seeking advice on anything, I would much rather listen to a 70 year old (who has life experience), than an 18 year old, just out of school.
Yes.And someone with experience of being both in and out so is able to offer an informed opinion
You're making a massive false correlation between pre-EU times being good and post-EU times being bad. This came up about 400 pages ago on the EU thread but the basic fact of the matter is that the world is changing. In 1960/70 anyone could get a half decent job and raise a family because the UK a large part of global GDP. UK GDP was larger than China's as recently as the 1990s.
The world is changing and the UK has to scrape and scrap for every job, every percentage of GDP and every opportunity to get ahead of its many competitors.
The global economy of the future will benefit those who write the rules. We wrote them post-war and did very well - no one to argue. Well now lots of people want a say. It will be those with the biggest economies who shape the rules and the system that suits them. This is the reality:
Now do we write these rules as equals with the US and China, or have them dictated to us? That is what you have to ask yourselves.
There are no easy jobs, and there will be a shrinking welfare state. How to you maintain Western standards of living without historic Western economic dominance?
Moreover the EU years have been fantastic for the UK economy. Before we joined the EU we had 3 day weeks, rampant unemployment and a smaller economy than either Italy or France. Today we are bigger than both. This is partly due to Thatcher's reforms and partly due to the impact of EU standardisation, regulation and market access. We have grown far more than our competitors inside the EU. The EU has been very good for the UK economy.
The world is a tough place but leaving the EU will not allow you to work fewer hours for more money, or get a better mortage, or a manufacturing job. Being competitive and productive will, and we are more competitive and productive inside the EU. It's tough but that's th reality of the 21st century.
Surely the reverse... the less you have lived as a voting adult, the less life experience you have to make an informed decision .!!Surely the less time you have to live with the consequences, the less your vote should count. For every 10 years you've been on this planet (and others), your vote should be weighted less 20%.
Age
18-30 100% weighted vote
30-40 80%
40-50 60%
50-60 40%
50-60 20%
60-70 10%
80+ You've had your time and in 7 years time when the shite really hits the fan you'll statistically be tied to a television.
Just a thought, eh.
And got rich out of it. Then decided that they should charge the next generations for an education, made rent unaffordable and then have the audacity to call us all workshy and lazy.
They ruined the country.
Strange the post war generation, who had suffered much deprivation in the fifties, managed to forge a life of full employment, good wages, buy houses in their twenties etc. This was done by a good education and hard work. And no, the younger generation are not supporting the seniors.They paid their dues and taxes all their working lives.
All the EU years has given younger generations is further education you have to pay for, longer working hours, no chance of a mortgage until you are heading for middle age, loss of manufacturing jobs etc. Unless you are an unelected, perked up EU employed leech of course.
No idea why anybody would want to remain.
Can't see why you are so enthralled into remaining.
Sure , no problem , it can also be weighted on the AMOUNT of consequences you have to live with , say Someone from lincolnshire which is flooded with eastern europeans has a vote that is worth far more than someone from say, brighton, which, isnt ?Surely the less time you have to live with the consequences, the less your vote should count. For every 10 years you've been on this planet (and others), your vote should be weighted less 20%.
Age
18-30 100% weighted vote
30-40 80%
40-50 60%
50-60 40%
50-60 20%
60-70 10%
80+ You've had your time and in 7 years time when the shite really hits the fan you'll statistically be tied to a television.
Just a thought, eh.