[NSC] Should Mustafa II be unbanned?

[Whitechapel]

oh to be perfect....

No means perfect, in fact I’ve had accounts banned from NSC. The difference I was about 16 and I can now see that I was acting like a bellend.

A fully grown adult not being able to do that is quite sad, tbh.

 

[NorthLainer]

Paraphrasing an esteemed former manager:

"These are a very popcorn-able thread"

 

[jcdenton08]

Ooh, what did he do? I missed that....

Had a massive flounce over basically nothing, then insisted that Bozza manually went through and deleted every single one of his posts because NSC was “profiting” from all the “revenue” through clicks that his posts brought in. This included some threads with thousands of posts such as the Netflix one. I understand this was a massive ball ache and very time consuming to do.

Then he just came back under his current username without a word of apology, acted like nothing happened, had several more flounces until he got his account restricted.

And now we’re here.

That boy ain’t right.

 

[Cornwallboy]

You seriously think the other 'side' is any better? Two opposites are never going to 'tolerate' the opinion of each other in an argument – that's why it's an argument!

Weird thread just got weirder.

Fair point and I totally agree. Mostly political debate involving opposing sides is a waste of time.

 

[Cornwallboy]

Oh go on then. Let's have a look at some of your posts.....

First we have some insults.















And finally, since you're not denying being behind both accounts, outright lies.

Can you prove I'm behind both accounts?

 

[Normal Rob]

I feel very let down by NSC, and in particular @Mustafa II . I have read all the way through this thread fully expecting him to be both fully reinstated (tick) and then banned again. It's not happened. Things have changed.

 

[BN9 BHA]

Where’s the “couldn’t give two knobs of goat shit either way” option?

We will put you down as “don’t know”

 

[birthofanorange]

Where’s the “couldn’t give two knobs of goat shit either way” option?

Better than "two shits of goat knobs" - anyone might think you've been dining out with @Herr Tubthumper .

 

[cjd]

Mustapha was never one of my favourite posters and his flounce sometime ago caused a lot of problems for Darren McKay.

I'm really surprised he allowed him to "waltz back on here without an apology" . I'm not sure what this says about the Forum owner...? I have always found the owner to be balanced, fair and incredibly tolerant, but surely there has to be a limit , otherwise it looks like weakness....?

As regards one of the moderators on this particular thread....hmmmmm.

 

[Peacehaven Wild Kids]

Nah, these wet wanks that post a loud of shit n here when we lose two on the bounce.

Plenty of good posters outweigh them

 

[Harry Wilson's tackle]

As much as I'd thoroughly enjoy a "Name that tune" related to this I fear it will descend into chaos if it hasn't already. At the end of the day we don't need to argue the miniature over 5,000 words and several pages. It's a message board arguing about why we can't score a goal for shit. We're not Resse Witherspoon in Legally Blonde.

Translation:

"I have a short attention span and, sorry what was the question?"

 

[Harry Wilson's tackle]

I have never used the ignore feature myself but fully agree with you here. There are 2 or 3 sanctimonious bell-ends on here that get on my tits. Clearly arrogant enough to think we're hanging on their every word, that they'll write an essay that takes up half the page on your screen. Newsflash: I don't care what you think, and I don't read your long-winded boring shite. I doubt I'm alone.

On the other hand I actually find Mustafa II's whinging quite funny. Not as funny as Cornwallboy's though. I literally chuckle out loud whenever I read his drivel - with him it's either moaning about cancel culture or ill-considered right wing bile. He literally doesn't post anything else.

No need to go on and on about it

 

[Motogull]

Discourage user should never be used.

Yes it should. For:

1. Anyone that makes an oh so funny fish pun.
2. Anyone that mention's Leo's penalty.
3. Anyone that starts yet another RDZ thread.
4. That NSCer that starts so many sad shite threads.

 

[dazzer6666]

Yes it should. For:

1. Anyone that makes an oh so funny fish pun.
2. Anyone that mention's Leo's penalty.
3. Anyone that starts yet another RDZ thread.
4. That NSCer that starts so many sad shite threads.

Bit presumptuous. You need knocking off your PERCH

 

[KZNSeagull]

Yes it should. For:

1. Anyone that makes an oh so funny fish pun.
2. Anyone that mention's Leo's penalty.
3. Anyone that starts yet another RDZ thread.
4. That NSCer that starts so many sad shite threads.

There is no plaice for this on here

 

[Iggle Piggle]

Translation:

"I have a short attention span and, sorry what was the question?"

No. It really isn't. I'm partial to a long post myself. On occasion, it's worth reading. If every post of some posters, however, is like the recipe for Cheese on Toast bring turned into Dostoevsky then I'm out.

 

[Motogull]

Bit presumptuous. You need knocking off your PERCH

And those prannies that mis-spell Friday.

 

[Motogull]

There is no plaice for this on here

Oh my aching sides.

I knew some wouldn't be able to resist.

 

[Harry Wilson's tackle]

No. It really isn't. I'm partial to a long post myself. On occasion, it's worth reading. If every post of some posters, however, is like the recipe for Cheese on Toast bring turned into Dostoevsky then I'm out.

 

[Harry Wilson's tackle]

Yes it should. For:

1. Anyone that makes an oh so funny fish pun.
2. Anyone that mention's Leo's penalty.
3. Anyone that starts yet another RDZ thread.
4. That NSCer that starts so many sad shite threads.

There's a time and plaice for everything