Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Should Hart and Hawes be sacked for Lickergate?

Should Hart and Hawes be sacked for Lickergate?

  • Yes

    Votes: 11 7.0%
  • No

    Votes: 147 93.0%

  • Total voters
    158


Giraffe

VERY part time moderator
Helpful Moderator
NSC Patron
Aug 8, 2005
27,234
In my view this potential sacking is the worst injustice since Chris Catlin was sacked all those years ago. I am truly gobsmacked by the reaction to this.

I am voting a big NO.

If you agree then vote with me, if not then I suggest you stay indoors in a dark room with the radio and telly off because frankly you may be offended every ten seconds.
 














Rookie

Greetings
Feb 8, 2005
12,324
looking at in context then no but going by past form when commentators say stupid things they got there marching orders i.e Ron Atkinson and Rodney Marsh.
 


surrey jim

Not in Surrey
Aug 2, 2005
18,162
Bevendean
although i find some of his coments annoying and dont agree with everything he says he does present a good show compared to other BBC local radio shows ive lisend to after awy games.

im going for NO, should keep job
 






Giraffe

VERY part time moderator
Helpful Moderator
NSC Patron
Aug 8, 2005
27,234
Why have they been included together?

Because they are have both "supposedly" committed the crime of the century. Forget about the murderers and muggers, drug takers, and general scum that line our street its these two that have been torn apart in the Argus and in the Telegraph.

This whole episode symbolises what is wrong with our society. The world has gone mad.
 


Wozza

Custom title
NSC Patron
Jul 6, 2003
24,378
Minteh Wonderland
Because they are have both "supposedly" committed the crime of the century. Forget about the murderers and muggers, drug takers, and general scum that line our street its these two that have been torn apart in the Argus and in the Telegraph.

This whole episode symbolises what is wrong with our society. The world has gone mad.

But one is a serial offender. For the other, it's a first offence.

One said the comment. The other merely repeated, perhaps not knowing the full meaning.

One has been sacked. The other has merely been suspended.

Also, er, according to the NSC poll, Albion fans want to save one man TWICE as much as the other.
 


Giraffe

VERY part time moderator
Helpful Moderator
NSC Patron
Aug 8, 2005
27,234
But one is a serial offender. For the other, it's a first offence.

One said the comment. The other merely repeated, perhaps not knowing the full meaning.

One has been sacked. The other has merely been suspended.

Also, er, according to the NSC poll, Albion fans want to save one man TWICE as much as the other.

I think thats a nonsense. One man suggested that people go and lick windows and the other enquired if there were any window lickers out there. Its the same thing isn't it? I had never heard of the phrase before frankly but am reliably informed by my disabled friend that it is used. I should add by the way that he listened to it and laughed at the comment.

And as for that other poll, why post it? Its like saying who would you rather had lived Diana or Mother Theresa. Whoever loses doesn't deserve to die.
 


























Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here