JC Footy Genius
Bringer of TRUTH
- Jun 9, 2015
- 10,568
No mention of NATO? I thought he said this attack was an act of War.
Act of warNo mention of NATO? I thought he said this attack was an act of War.
Act of war
..Time for countries to control their borders instead of letting every Tom dick and Harry just walk in...Sort out the troubles within and work from there.
Having open borders everywhere is just bloody ludicrous
Act of war
With many thousands scattered all over the show its goner take something special to stop all this that's for sure.
You can bomb Syria etc til it's flattened,but that's minuscule to what's out there....Time for countries to control their borders instead of letting every Tom dick and Harry just walk in...Sort out the troubles within and work from there.
Having open borders everywhere is just bloody ludicrous:nono:
The French president is now announcingmore funding for police and defence.
He said security and armed forces must have more means at their disposal.
No job cuts in the military will occur until at least 2019*and*5,000 new police jobs will be created*within two years.
Security measures will increase spending, he said, but*security is more important than EU spending rules.
Refugees and asylum seekers we take in?Its time that all countries toughened their borders as illegals still flock here as well as everywhere else.It is within mainland Europe where there is easy road access
It's time Europe opens its eyes and protects its people.Ludicrous considering the threats we face and was absurd even when we didn't.
The French Ambassador said that this attack was of a similar level of aggression to 9/11 which was the only time article 5 of the NATO treaty has been triggered calling on all members to respond militarily. Looks like the French are bypassing this option. Sighs of relief in many European capitals methinks.
Refugees and asylum seekers we take in?Its time that all countries toughened their borders as illegals still flock here as well as everywhere else.
[/B]
Whilst I would not in any way disagree with that being a greater priority, we are told that we cannot do this and that as it is an EU rule.
I wish I could say that all those around the borders were decent,but that's not a risk we should be taking full stop.At least we have boarder and passport control so it makes it difficult for them to enter illegally.
The refugees we're meant to be taking in are from the camps in and around Syria. Unless ISIS have planted operatives in these camps (more difficult as everyone will already be registered), then we have nothing to fear from them.
At least we have boarder and passport control so it makes it difficult for them to enter illegally.
The refugees we're meant to be taking in are from the camps in and around Syria. Unless ISIS have planted operatives in these camps (more difficult as everyone will already be registered), then we have nothing to fear from them.
In the aftermath of these bombing it is most obvious the EU have got to order the restoring of borders. How intense the countries wish to control them is up to them individually.
Is this problem really about borders?
Let's not forget, the 7/7 bombers were all raised Britain.
That's what I stated a page back...Is this problem really about borders?
Let's not forget, the 7/7 bombers were all raised in Britain.
Is this problem really about borders?
Let's not forget, the 7/7 bombers were all raised in Britain.
In my view, and some may argue, this photo suggests the way forward and that Saudi cannot influence US policy with Russia involved.
View attachment 70037