fly high
Well-known member
thing is the recent legislation did increase the standards, bringing in requirement to reduce storm water overflows. the amendment mentioned want to make it zero overflow, with immediate effect. not very practical, a cynic might say was put forward to be voted down. would argue the new legislation doesnt go far enough, questions over whether enforcment works, just saying you're naughty and a fine for sewage discharge doesnt actually stop them. i like the idea of executives swimming in areas, not sure can work that in to law.
what i cant quite understand is why the storm water goes into sewage in the first place, thought was supposed to go off into waterways seperately. seems problem has been built into the system, very difficult to undo if so.
The problem is built in in some areas. Early drainage systems were combined with foul & storm in the same pipes, which then just went straight into the sea or rivers.