Barrel of Fun
Abort, retry, fail
We seem to have a lot of Puns.KinkyGoebels said:Q Puns about best ever save.
Falmer decision, best ever home victory etc. Although the referee has spotted something and their is time added on....
We seem to have a lot of Puns.KinkyGoebels said:Q Puns about best ever save.
Icy Gull said:You omit to mention that he also put in a fair number of goal saving tackles in the box and was quick enough to recover from some of his mistakes. Yes he was raw and a bit lightweight but you'd have to be blind or very biased not to have seen the potential.
Harding had good technique and obvious promise, but made some elementary errors.Harold said:He was not the worst, but he was not class with us.
How the memory of his efforts has obviously faded.
Fair play to him if he cracks it at Leeds where his load is probably a bit lighter. He had a lot more defending to do with us and was lightweight, had poor concentration and made a lot of key mistakes that led to goals.
Stumpy Tim said:Jones & Watson were simply not good enough. Please remember back to when they played and EVERYONE said they were shit.
Simster said:Harding had good technique and obvious promise, but made some elementary errors.
The boy has clearly now reduced the number of those mistakes and is obviously quite popular at Leeds, which supports McGhee's positive comments about him. Unfortunately, we were not in a position to be patient for him to iron out these mistakes from his game with first team experience - every point counts when you are fighting a relegation battle. Leeds had the money, they doubled his wages, and they are in a position to give him a chance to make those mistakes. Our gain is a financial one, there gain is that they are getting a promising young player who is getting better with experience.
In the end, we needed to sell him and it's time to to move on.
the full harris said:Nathan Jones was NEVER shit. He is the most underrated player we have ever have. Sadly I was in a minority of about 2 who thought this at the time.
KinkyGoebels said:Nope i agree, he always looked to go forward with the ball and had a decent cross on him as shown at Leeds away last year.
the full harris said:Yes and, more importantly than that, his attitude is and has always been spot on. If more belief had been shown in him, I am sure he could have done a more than able job at left back this season.
DAMANCLAY said:But he just was not good enough for this league he was either brilliant or utter wank and he was usually the later. We need consistancy and he just does not have it.
enigma said:Jones was good going forward, could cross and worked hard but he wasnt a very good defender.
the full harris said:How many appearance has Nathan Jones made in this league for you to base this judgement on?
B.M.F said:Not many but if he was good enough why is he not playing in our league at the moment?
Don't get me wrong because I did like Jonah but the proof is in the pudding as they say.
Icy Gull said:Jones always struck me as a headless chicken guaranteed to make at least one dreadful pass a game that left the opposition with a clear run on goal.
the full harris said:Could the same be said of Gary Hart?
the full harris said:It could be argued that a lot of our current players would not be playing in this league were they not playing for us, it just seemed a waste to let him go when we have a lack of left sided players. I can't imagine he was on particularly large wages.