- Thread starter
- #161
And there's your problem.Bozza should seriously think about banning BG permantely.
He brings nothing but massive revenue.
And there's your problem.Bozza should seriously think about banning BG permantely.
He brings nothing but massive revenue.
When he was walking off he was chatting and accepting apologiesHow could he do that whilst he was unconscious on the floor?
Oh, I see.
Sure, but he had no idea what happened.When he was walking off he was chatting and accepting apologies
What's the definition of 'such incidents'?
.
I don't think so. Incidents can be reported, but the panel don't look at everything that the ref hasn't acted on, or that the ref may have got wrong.Is it not deemed incidents that the ref may have not seen or missed and not taken the correct action with for whatever reason.
Is it not deemed incidents that the ref may have not seen or missed and not taken the correct action with for whatever reason. That is how I read it.
simmo, why don't you put him on your ignore list?
Likewise, but he's not annoying me enough to care. If you're happy to be banned because of him though, perhaps you should make an exception.No one goes on my ignore list
Likewise, but he's not annoying me enough to care. If you're happy to be banned because of him though, perhaps you should make an exception.
They were your words not mineTriggaaar, I don't believe Iv'e done anything to get banned yet
They were your words not mine
I did that once, the only person I think I've ever done that to, but the problem is you end up seeing his posts as quotes anyway as so many people question his idiotic comments.Simmo, why don't you put him on your ignore list?
Why don't you just feck off and bore some other forum to death--------------I'm quite happy to be banned permanently all the time you are allowed to spout complete bollocks on NSC.
You are a STUFFED SHIRT - UP YOURSELF - DELUDED NO IT ALL NO NOTHING ****.
Yesterday you described several thousand Albion fans who would like to see a beamback from Palarse as egotistical.
You are the most egoistical bloke I have ever come across.
Obviously you will not read this as I'm blocked
I did that once, the only person I think I've ever done that to, but the problem is you end up seeing his posts as quotes anyway as so many people question his idiotic comments.
That loophole was closed a while ago. As long as the quote isn't mangled by the person posting it, the text will be hidden if the quoted user is on your ignore list.
No retrospectivte action being taken so it would appear that the panel of refs who watch these things agreed with Stuart Atwell that it was not a deliberate foul or bookable offence. which is what I thought at the time.and subsequent TV footage hasnt convinced them that the decision made was wrong.
I am often accused of not knowing anything about football but this is a panel of professional refs who agree with the action taken or not taken however you see it , so how can that be so wrong.
Mark Halsey also said so as well but that doesnt make it correct only the views of 2 ex refs. 1 who was good and 1 who was crap.
Just watched this time and time again he gave him no room at all it was a foul and the ref has cocked up.