Pavilionaire
Well-known member
- Jul 7, 2003
- 31,263
Well we certainly could have done with him last season instead of Baker Boatey and Duffus from the bench, who weren't ready and did little.
He seemed to play on the inside left for Ipswich last season which really suited him.He's had a lot of games to improve and is not a winger. He'll be good in a central position
Did little? Well, what do you expect them to have done in about 20 minutes playing time between them? - and Duffus didn't even play a single PL minute!Well we certainly could have done with him last season instead of Baker Boatey and Duffus from the bench, who weren't ready and did little.
"If only......if only......if only everything could have been completely different"Did little? Well, what do you expect them to have done in about 20 minutes playing time between them? - and Duffus didn't even play a single PL minute!
Seriously though, yes, Sarmiento might have been a useful sub at times (as he certainly was for Ipswich!) but maybe the experience he got out on loan was worth more development-wise.
Generally very true - but I don't think the odd occasion when it might have been useful to have Sarmiento on the bench really counts as an 'if only' moment though. Robinson passing the ball to Smith, on the other hand........................................"If only......if only......if only everything could have been completely different"
This is a line from the TV comedy, Bottom.Generally very true - but I don't think the odd occasion when it might have been useful to have Sarmiento on the bench really counts as an 'if only' moment though. Robinson passing the ball to Smith, on the other hand........................................
There were multiple times last season we needed width and a distuptor, but RDZ didn't use Baker Boatey so - in effect we were a player light on the bench. You say Sarmiento was better out on loan, but he wasn't playing for the Baggies and was usually sub for Ipswich. A couple of goals and assists from Sarmiento could have made the difference of a top 10 finish / meeting Tony's goal and 11th spot/ finishing behind Palace.Generally very true - but I don't think the odd occasion when it might have been useful to have Sarmiento on the bench really counts as an 'if only' moment though. Robinson passing the ball to Smith, on the other hand........................................
The Baggies weren't using him - that's why we took him off them. He certainly made a good contribution to Ipswich's promotion, so decent development experience there. RDZ decided not to use BBB - OK, his choice.There were multiple times last season we needed width and a distuptor, but RDZ didn't use Baker Boatey so - in effect we were a player light on the bench. You say Sarmiento was better out on loan, but he wasn't playing for the Baggies and was usually sub for Ipswich. A couple of goals and assists from Sarmiento could have made the difference of a top 10 finish / meeting Tony's goal and 11th spot/ finishing behind Palace.
If you look at Hurzerler's system, he prefers to have one winger that plays wide, one winger that plays closer to the striker as a number 10.Just don’t see where he fits in the new system. Similar to Buonanotte. Neither are great on the wing and doesn’t look like they’ll be an out and out number 10 in the new system. Wouldn’t have either of them as one of the midfield either… so, where do they play?
That sounds much like Brentford’s Rico Henry and BenRama (sp)He seemed to play on the inside left for Ipswich last season which really suited him.
Their left wing back ran the wing (and got the most assists in the Championship) whilst Jeremy was tucked in more centrally and looked very good on the number of occasions I watched him. However, he does seem so similar to Enciso in style. But if we start sending teenagers like Osman and Minteh on loan, he’ll certainly be needed.
Aberdeen and Cardiff? A huge backwards step for the lad.