Sandy Hook Hoax shooting?

[pastafarian]

I recalled seeing this thread although I hadn't actually read it. Having just seen the final few posts I'm a little apprehensive about reviving it but I came across this & someone was bound to bring it up so

well spotted

just as well no one with half a brain cell takes professor James Tracy seriously except of course the most gullible who cant see fake jizz when its in their face.

 

[Spanish Seagulls]

Conspiracy theorists really just cannot accept anything as fact. There is nothing that you can't find an alternative theory for but that doesn't mean that there is any truth in it. I did however start to doubt the whole 9/11 scenario when I watched Zeitgeist but then again you could turn almost anything on its head if you tried.

 

[pastafarian]

Conspiracy theorists really just cannot accept anything as fact. There is nothing that you can't find an alternative theory for but that doesn't mean that there is any truth in it. I did however start to doubt the whole 9/11 scenario when I watched Zeitgeist but then again you could turn almost anything on its head if you tried.

zeitgeist is a very good example of how to manipulate the audience,it is very well put together
you will not be the first to ask questions after watching zeitgeist,i watched it and my first reaction was WTF, my second reaction(B) was ok place brain back into skull

unfortunately many do avoid option B

 

[pastafarian]

might as well ask whilst this has been revitalized at you the [MENTION=12292]The Truth[/MENTION]

you were asked page one by edna krabappel is this a hoax or an inside job as you claimed

obviously cant be both ,you never did answer ednas question.....care to do so now?

 

[BadFish]

might as well ask whilst this has been revitalized at you the [MENTION=12292]The Truth[/MENTION]

you were asked page one by edna krabappel is this a hoax or an inside job as you claimed

obviously cant be both ,you never did answer ednas question.....care to do so now?

I think you are wasting your time here. @TheTruth doesn't like to respond to straight questions that may unravel his belief system if he thinks about them. He has been asked many direct questions on this thread and ignored or avoided most i not all of them. With skills in diversion, avoiding questions and a complete detachment from reality I think a career in politics beckons.

 

[birthofanorange]

As a occasional lurker/poster here, I had not had the (dubious) pleasure of seeing this thread until now. For the first few pages I was hugely entertained, to the point of forgetting my promise to myself to abstain from alcohol during this month. I found myself heading for the fridge with the intention of settling down with a nice cold beer and chuckle away at the nonsense being spouted by The Truth. However, I suddenly realised my mistake and replaced the can in the fridge with the realisation that it is not remotely funny to find amusement in the clearly obvious mental illness displayed by the OP, let alone gloss over the fact that so many innocent people died in this tragedy and this thread just sullies their memory. The only good thing to come out of this for me, is the mention of the ignore button, which I have never used before - here, nor on any other forum I am a member of - but have now been forced by my conscience to use.

 

[BadFish]

As a occasional lurker/poster here, I had not had the (dubious) pleasure of seeing this thread until now. For the first few pages I was hugely entertained, to the point of forgetting my promise to myself to abstain from alcohol during this month. I found myself heading for the fridge with the intention of settling down with a nice cold beer and chuckle away at the nonsense being spouted by The Truth. However, I suddenly realised my mistake and replaced the can in the fridge with the realisation that it is not remotely funny to find amusement in the clearly obvious mental illness displayed by the OP, let alone gloss over the fact that so many innocent people died in this tragedy and this thread just sullies their memory. The only good thing to come out of this for me, is the mention of the ignore button, which I have never used before - here, nor on any other forum I am a member of - but have now been forced by my conscience to use.

To be fair ignoring him probably isn't going to help him much or do anything for the victims of the shooting. I would suggest that challenging his views with logic, fact and resonably well researched information is far better for both the individual and the victims of the tragedy. He no doubt goes on many websites that amp up his theories and validate his research as fact. Coming on here and being challenged is probably psychologically more nourishing, even if he doges the hard questions and ignores much of what is put to him.

 

[Drumstick]

I don't know why you all want evidence, CLEARLY 'they' have removed all evidence. You have to find the odd bits and coincidences then believe it until someone can PROVE your wrong.

Duuh.

 

[TWOCHOICEStom]

Not sure if it's been mentioned, I can't be arsed to trawl through the thread tbh.

But it's ENTIRELY possibly to rename and update the url of a facebook page.

 

[Manx Shearwater]

I love the way that WE are all sheep, and yet none of the wierdos on here ever comes up with their own theories and evidence, its all internet videos by some other nutter that they've swallowed hook line and sinker and then want to peddle as the unequivocal truth.

Oh, the irony.

 

[dingodan]

 

[brightonrock]

Here's how a conspiracy theory works:

1. Find a tragedy. From this point forward, it is ALWAYS the fault of the government or a shady unofficial organisation with plans for world power.
2. The government or world power never makes a mistake, everything is planned. For example, if an MP leaves a confidential file on a train, it's not because he's human and made a mistake. No. It was deliberate, to divert attention whilst hiding the real story. EVERYTHING is planned.
3. There is no such thing as a coincidence. Ever.
4. Find something inconsequential and vaguely contradictory to the official report. This is to form the basis of your argument.
5. If actual hard evidence disproving your theory is offered, remember points 2 and 3; that evidence is there for a reason, because the government/shady world power planted it there to cover their tracks. Essentially, evidence disproving your theory is only further proof of your theory.
6. Anyone who doubts or questions you should be challenged to 'open their mind'. When this suggestion is aimed at yourself in return, encourage said doubter to 'do the research'. Post a link to a blog by a 14 year old stoner or a YouTube video of a 46 year old virgin in a dark room shouting.
7. Find another tragedy. Repeat steps 2-7.

 

[LE19]

Not sure if it's been mentioned, I can't be arsed to trawl through the thread tbh.

But it's ENTIRELY possibly to rename and update the url of a facebook page.

And BBC pages:

 

[Manx Shearwater]

Here's how a conspiracy theory works:

1. Find a tragedy. From this point forward, it is ALWAYS the fault of the government or a shady unofficial organisation with plans for world power.
2. The government or world power never makes a mistake, everything is planned. For example, if an MP leaves a confidential file on a train, it's not because he's human and made a mistake. No. It was deliberate, to divert attention whilst hiding the real story. EVERYTHING is planned.
3. There is no such thing as a coincidence. Ever.
4. Find something inconsequential and vaguely contradictory to the official report. This is to form the basis of your argument.
5. If actual hard evidence disproving your theory is offered, remember points 2 and 3; that evidence is there for a reason, because the government/shady world power planted it there to cover their tracks. Essentially, evidence disproving your theory is only further proof of your theory.
6. Anyone who doubts or questions you should be challenged to 'open their mind'. When this suggestion is aimed at yourself in return, encourage said doubter to 'do the research'. Post a link to a blog by a 14 year old stoner or a YouTube video of a 46 year old virgin in a dark room shouting.
7. Find another tragedy. Repeat steps 2-7.

You forgot 'if asked a very tricky question that is impossible to answer without compromising your position and theories just change the subject and then continue to ignore the question over and over again.

Or go "Fwah fwah fwah, you see, I can do an posh English accent too, Piers"

 

[SeagullSongs]

And BBC pages:
View attachment 38323

 

[LE19]

View attachment 38324

 

[Dick Knights Mumm]

When a see a screenshot of a desk top - it reminds me of the classic "soapy tit wank" thread. Not an NSC thread sadly - but so funny.

 

[SeagullSongs]

When a see a screenshot of a desk top - it reminds me of the classic "soapy tit wank" thread. Not an NSC thread sadly - but so funny.

I'm now trying hard to refrain from googling "soapy tit wank"...

No good, back in a minute.

 

[Dick Knights Mumm]

I'm now trying hard to refrain from googling "soapy tit wank"...

No good, back in a minute.

I did the same - I think you can get to it via Football Famble - but a site you need to register on.

Plus there are other search results.

 

[readingstockport]

Here's how a conspiracy theory works:

1. Find a tragedy. From this point forward, it is ALWAYS the fault of the government or a shady unofficial organisation with plans for world power.
2. The government or world power never makes a mistake, everything is planned. For example, if an MP leaves a confidential file on a train, it's not because he's human and made a mistake. No. It was deliberate, to divert attention whilst hiding the real story. EVERYTHING is planned.
3. There is no such thing as a coincidence. Ever.
4. Find something inconsequential and vaguely contradictory to the official report. This is to form the basis of your argument.
5. If actual hard evidence disproving your theory is offered, remember points 2 and 3; that evidence is there for a reason, because the government/shady world power planted it there to cover their tracks. Essentially, evidence disproving your theory is only further proof of your theory.
6. Anyone who doubts or questions you should be challenged to 'open their mind'. When this suggestion is aimed at yourself in return, encourage said doubter to 'do the research'. Post a link to a blog by a 14 year old stoner or a YouTube video of a 46 year old virgin in a dark room shouting.
7. Find another tragedy. Repeat steps 2-7.

One of the best I ever saw was done deliberately to show the 9/11 idiots just how wrong they were. Someone mocked up a series of youtube videos showing, with fabricated footage, how it was impossible for the towers to have fallen as they did. Within 24 hours it had been picked up and reposted on sites like above top secret. The bloke then came into the open and expalined EXACTLY how he had made the film and how those who believed it were simply being silly. He made it and he knew exactly how the fabrication had taken place. He explained in great detail.

You can guess the result. Not a single CTer was convinced. Some told him that he was mistaken and the video was obviously true, despite him providing comprehensive proof that he had made it. Others told him that he was a zog stooge and was deliberately lying to discredit the cters. Not a one of them put their hands up and said 'You know what, you got me. I accept the video was a moderately clever fake and I accept what you are saying'. Last I heard, and this was some 3 years after he made the video, it was still being cited on ct websites as PROOF that 9/11 was an inside job.