Originunknown
BINFEST'ING
Lucky boy, however we were due a bit of luck and I think we'd have had enough to edge past them even with 10 men.
I forgot about the taking things absolutely literally. Can I rephrase to committing less errors, or being more consistent in order to win his no.1 status back. There is no great conspiracy here, Steele has won the confidence of the manager through hard work and performance, and Sanchez needs to do the same to win it back.Its over for him in that case. There has never been any error free footballer and Robert Sanchez won't be the first one.
I'm pretty sure that "mistakes" like that (or great save given what I have written above) are less important to RDZ than his tendency to go long under pressure. Steele draws the press and keeps it short.Glad that was his 'one mistake' and nothing more serious. Other than that, solid game and when called upon, was solid.
Not what I saw. It was actually quite a clumsy take from Sanchez. Here he is following the ball and doesn't actually grasp it until it is passing underneath his backside, which is why I said it looked clumsy. I am satisfied that Sanchez knew what he was doing and the decision was correct.How about this one when he first touches the ball. Right foot over line (irrelevant on its own) but ball is in front of his right foot. But maybe not clear and obvious. Still think we got away with that. Still confident we would have won with 10 men.
Oh I don’t know, I did used to moan like buggery about Solly being the most frustrating Albion player I’d ever seen as he sent over crosses without looking up having shown so much skill to get into a position to do itYeah but you've never been one who chases scapegoats, unlike a lot of other people.
Maybe you're not well integrated to modern hyper-individualistic society where success and failure in a team game comes down to one bloke.
Anyway, have to take the positives: people have been looking long and hard to find the real reason (person) Brighton aren't winning every single game and topping the league. They tried with Solly early in the season, Webster a few months ago until they finally found pleasure and relief in Sanchez.
Agree that it can't be proven beyond doubt and thats why VAR ignored it eventually. Which is fair enough.I still haven't seen a single image that proves beyond doubt the whole of the ball was over all of the line, which is what would have been needed.
Even if VAR had concluded it was handball they then have a second decision to make about clear goal scoring opportunity. Given what @Acker79 has posted from the laws and about how close Sanchez was to the striker I don't think that necessarily would have ended up as a red, even if a replay showed light between the ball and line - which it hasn't.
Indeed, something I only learned recently. It's not inside the box, it's on the box, so the line is the keepers as well. News to me until a few months ago!If a smidgen is on the line, it's fine.
But, again, Dunk isn’t a keeper. The laws Acker quoted specifically apply to goalkeepersAgree that it can't be proven beyond doubt and thats why VAR ignored it eventually. Which is fair enough.
The take that it wouldn't have been a red (if it was outside) is pretty wild though. If Lewis Dunk have a one meter advantage in a 1on1 as the last defender and picks the ball up with both his hands, he gets a red card. Same goes for anyone else doing that in that situation.
Doesn't matter where he thinks he is. If he leans forward and picks it up with his hands, he is deliberately handling the ball with his hands.I'm a little confused about the red card for handball law. I thought it was for deliberate handball denying a goal scoring opportunity. But in this case I can't see how it is a deliberate handball, Sanchez thinks it's in the area, ergo not deliberate handball.
I'd also argue that Willians wasnt deliberate either.
Yes, deliberately handling the ball, but not committing a deliberate handball.Doesn't matter where he thinks he is. If he leans forward and picks it up with his hands, he is deliberately handling the ball with his hands.
Yes and like Nick Pope was sent off for handling the ball outside the penalty area in a one on one against the opponent, Robert Sanchez would also have been sent off if he was handling the ball outside the penalty area in a one on one. What Acker quoted also says that "The goalkeeper has the same restrictions on handling the ball as any other player outside the penalty area." If Lewis Dunk can not pick up the ball with his hands outside the penalty area, Robert Sanchez also can not do it.But, again, Dunk isn’t a keeper. The laws Acker quoted specifically apply to goalkeepers
Think this was the sort of decision that the "clear and obvious" caveat was inserted for?I still haven't seen a single image that proves beyond doubt the whole of the ball was over all of the line, which is what would have been needed.
Even if VAR had concluded it was handball they then have a second decision to make about clear goal scoring opportunity. Given what @Acker79 has posted from the laws and about how close Sanchez was to the striker I don't think that necessarily would have ended up as a red, even if a replay showed light between the ball and line - which it hasn't.
There has been a few occasions when a player thought the ball was dead, picked it up with his hands and the opponents got awarded a penalty.Yes, deliberately handling the ball, but not committing a deliberate handball.
I think the semantics should be important.
Obviously as far as refs go they're not. They couldn't wait to give three reds to Fulham when i don't think any of them should have been given.