[Albion] Sanchez handball/red card?

[brighton_tom]

Was clearly outside the box but clear also VAR didn't have an angle. Presumably they don't get every single camera which seems a bit odd..
The Bob we know and love. There's a big difference between calm and wreckless. Very lucky boy especially after being dropped.

In real time I thought it was out, but if you look over the images in this thread then it was probably just in. Just. Or at worst inconclusive. The image we have that looks straight down the line shows why VAR went with the decision it did.

 

[dejavuatbtn]

It was OK, more by luck than judgment. But it is another indicator of why Big Bob gives me palpitations and why I breath a little better with Steele in goal.

 

[Swansman]

He wasn't outside the penalty box. That's the point.


That's not what the law says. The law says "The goalkeeper has the same restrictions on handling the ball as any other player outside the penalty area." it doesn't specify that where the ball is, is important (for situations like this, it would be quite helpful). It does, however, specify in multiple places, that the location of the goalkeeper is important.

Yes - same restrictions as any other player outside the penalty area: he's not allowed to handle it. You're not allowed to touch the ball with your hands outside the penalty area no matter where the rest of you are. If that was the case it would have been very easy for Rob Sanchez: he could have laid down, keeping his feet and perhaps legs in the area while getting his hands on the ball some 1.5 meters outside the box. But since that is very much not allowed, he tried to wait until the ball got into the box.

Similarly, if the goalie rushes out on a 1on1, gets lobbed and dives backwards to try to save the ball, it doesn't matter if his feet or body is outside the box as long as his hands are inside it.

 

[Triggaaar]

In real time I thought it was out, but if you look over the images in this thread then it was probably just in.

Like pretty much everyone else here it seems, I sit in line with the edge of the penalty box. In real time I thought (and said) 'oo, that looks close'.

I stand by that view.

 

[Milano]

I think he’s trying too hard, trying to play RDZball at all costs. That situation today - any keeper thinking straight just clears it, he isn’t thinking straight.

 

[pure_white]

we got lucky there, definitely no.2 GK for me

 

[Swansman]

I think he’s trying too hard, trying to play RDZball at all costs. That situation today - any keeper thinking straight just clears it, he isn’t thinking straight.

RDZ put him on the bench for not playing RDZball... of course he'll try very hard.

 

[fruitnveg]

I thought he was going to walk from where i was, opposite end of the pitch in the east upper. I'd love to know what goes on in his head sometimes. Makes some truly baffling decisions.

 

[Garry Nelson's Left Foot]

Maybe VAR used the same line as they did for Estupinan's goal against Palace?

Terrific wit aside, in real time watching on the beeb it looked like it was out/incredibly close to being out. The replays shown on t.v made it look in. The photo from behind play with the ball in the air make it look out but that's a terrible angle and shouldn't be trusted. Mitoma at the world cup should have taught us that much.

 

[Lenny Rider]

At Palace away the obvious VAR rickit changed the game, maybe this is all part of what Ron Atkinson used to say about it all even itself out over the season ‍♂

No disrespect to Grimsby I still think we’d have beaten them with 10.

 

[Live by the sea]

I was genuinely shocked that he wasn't sent off. I'd be absolutely fuming if I was a Grimsby fan.

Replays show it was on the line - very close but on the line is not outside the box . He did take a chance though .

 

[5Ways Gull]

He 100% picked the ball up outside the box, maybe a smidgen was on the line, it may not have been on the ground when he did so. The replay I saw did not freeze frame though, it was in real time.

In modern VAR influenced football a smidgen is a smidgen, so perfectly fair decision for me. Lots of goals these days disallowed due players being a smidgen offside. At the end of the day if we did get away with one I think we were due one.

 

[Thunder Bolt]

Me neither. It’s like people want it to be the case that Sanchez should have got a red so that he can be called a liability.

The above freeze is from the in-line camera. The angle of the other cameras gives a misleading view.

I used a tennis photo to show that. This is in.

 

[pb21]

I think this image should be sticked at the top of every page of this thread.

Based on this, which I think is the best available evidence, it wasn't handball.

 

[One Teddy Maybank]

Like pretty much everyone else here it seems, I sit in line with the edge of the penalty box. In real time I thought (and said) 'oo, that looks close'.

I stand by that view.

With you 100%.

We all thought he was off.

 

[Questions]

So why’re people here 100% certain that he committed red card offence?

Because it looked like he brought the ball back into his area.

 

[Icy Gull]

In modern VAR influenced football a smidgen is a smidgen, so perfectly fair decision for me. Lots of goals these days disallowed due players being a smidgen offside. At the end of the day if we did get away with one I think we were due one.

True, just like our disallowed goal, that was also tight

 

[Deleted member 37369]

I dont get this. How are people looking at this image and seeing it all outside the box? That is the var image that was shown. We didnt get away with one, it was the correct decision, although it was close.
View attachment 158539

Exactly. Just like when players position the ball for corners … the ball only has to ‘overhang’ the line to be ‘inside’.

 

[Thunder Bolt]

True, just like our disallowed goal, that was also tight

To be fair, the East linesman raised his flag immediately, not waiting for VAR. That only confirmed the original decision.

 

[Deleted member 37369]

This is the Mitoma incident at the World Cup where he pulled the ball back - originally ruled out - but goal given by var. There was loads of analysis after as it was so important. Some angles gave false impression ball was way over the line … but it was proved that the ball overhung the line and goal was correctly awarded.

Why Japan's winning goal vs. Spain was awarded by the VAR

We're analysing every VAR decision at the 2022 World Cup. The VAR crucially awarded Japan's winning goal against Spain, with the ball in play.

www.espn.co.uk