CaptainDaveUK
Well-known member
- Oct 18, 2010
- 1,537
Do rail seats fit more people into the stand? If so this would create a better atmosphere. Otherwise I can’t quite see the benefit of changing. UTA.
Do rail seats fit more people into the stand? If so this would create a better atmosphere. Otherwise I can’t quite see the benefit of changing. UTA.
Do rail seats fit more people into the stand? If so this would create a better atmosphere. Otherwise I can’t quite see the benefit of changing. UTA.
According to this it can increase capacity:
https://www.safestandingroadshow.co.uk/the-case-for-safe-standing/case-for-3
According to this it can increase capacity:
https://www.safestandingroadshow.co.uk/the-case-for-safe-standing/case-for-3
I don't know if it's still the case, but I believe the argument from the club in the past is that it may increase the number of seats, but it won't necessarily increase capacity (i.e. the number of tickets the club is allowed to sell), because capacity is limited by a licence that is determined by more than just how many seats there are - notably how quickly can the stand be emptied in an emergency (logicially it would take longer for 6000 people to evacuate a stand than it would 5000 people), how many people can enter over the course of an hour prior. There are then considerations for toilets and such (though I'm not sure how big an impact that has on the licence, and how much that is more about supporter experience).
Borussia Dortmund's ground goes from 66000 capacity for all seating to 81000 when the seats are converted to standing. For some reason BHA are vehemently against doing this, and have repeatedly said it would/could not increase capacity. Strange when you think they've just bunched seats up and squeezed seats into any nook and cranny they can find to increase capacity this season.
Borussia Dortmund is terracing rather than 'safe standing'
Do rail seats fit more people into the stand? If so this would create a better atmosphere. Otherwise I can’t quite see the benefit of changing. UTA.
Um, perhaps the safe element?
You'd think they would start with the back of the North, create a culture for it and slowly integrate it throughout the stand.
Obviously it is early days because the legislation hasn't been passed yet. But noticeable that an increasing amount of clubs are getting involved early. It is surprising that a club like ours which likes to be perceived as forward thinking, is seemingly not here.
Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
I'm pretty sure that even if there's the same number of people, a standing crowd will make more noise than a seated one because they're more involved, energetic, excited etc.
There's various interesting reasons for that to do with psychology and adrenaline and that sort of thing that I don't particularly understand or care about enough to try and understand.
I don't know if it's still the case, but I believe the argument from the club in the past is that it may increase the number of seats, but it won't necessarily increase capacity (i.e. the number of tickets the club is allowed to sell), because capacity is limited by a licence that is determined by more than just how many seats there are - notably how quickly can the stand be emptied in an emergency (logicially it would take longer for 6000 people to evacuate a stand than it would 5000 people), how many people can enter over the course of an hour prior. There are then considerations for toilets and such (though I'm not sure how big an impact that has on the licence, and how much that is more about supporter experience).
I take it you're not a regular at the Amex. A very large proportion of the North Stand stand already so I don't see how you can use that as an argument for increasing the atmosphere.
Um, perhaps the safe element?
You'd think they would start with the back of the North, create a culture for it and slowly integrate it throughout the stand.
Obviously it is early days because the legislation hasn't been passed yet. But noticeable that an increasing amount of clubs are getting involved early. It is surprising that a club like ours which likes to be perceived as forward thinking, is seemingly not here.
Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
I think there's a big difference between turning the North Stand into safe standing & the rest of the stadium. As the Getafe game was so quiet it was easy to see where the noise comes from and that is the back of the North Stand, you can't actually normally see that when it's full, as the eye perspective is different. From my viewpoint N1C looked like the place to be if you want something akin to the 'old days'. It will be the 1st place I check for tickets in future. No offence to the East side of the North Stand but I was on the West side and they sounded louder! Back of the North stand would be the ideal place to make safe standing.
Yeah but the only problem is that there is only about 50 of them. I've bought an occasional ticket in that area and there are too many grans and grandads who tut abut people standing. I'm still baffled why 50% of the NS bought season tickets there; they clearly have no intention of standing-up and singing...ever
Yeah but the only problem is that there is only about 50 of them. I've bought an occasional ticket in that area and there are too many grans and grandads who tut abut people standing. I'm still baffled why 50% of the NS bought season tickets there; they clearly have no intention of standing-up and singing...ever