Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Politics] Russia invades Ukraine (24/02/2022)



Marlton and Hove Albion

Active member
Oct 11, 2018
182
Sarasota FL
Kherson falls, what next?
A long decade of WW1 Trench Warfare. Occasional indiscriminate lobbing of missiles at civilian targets, trillions wasted on various weapons/aid, high oil prices (that help Russia), tens of thousands more dead (if we're lucky), lots of Ukrainian flags on Social Media Bios, various politicians speaking firmly about how tragic it all is, various armament makers laughing at all of us, no Russian sports teams in any competitions.......a lot of next but none of it positive.
 




Wrong-Direction

Well-known member
Mar 10, 2013
13,631
A long decade of WW1 Trench Warfare. Occasional indiscriminate lobbing of missiles at civilian targets, trillions wasted on various weapons/aid, high oil prices (that help Russia), tens of thousands more dead (if we're lucky), lots of Ukrainian flags on Social Media Bios, various politicians speaking firmly about how tragic it all is, various armament makers laughing at all of us, no Russian sports teams in any competitions.......a lot of next but none of it positive.
Even more depressing reading it written down..
 










ShandyH

Well-known member
Jan 22, 2010
998
Back in London
I’m pretty sure I’ve seen a lot of relatively sophisticated water craft with weaponry arriving in Ukraine; at least that’s what social media told me. If this is true, there will be a major push for Crimea soon. Those Russian troops in the outer western reaches south of the Dnipro river are very exposed now.
 


Eeyore

Colonel Hee-Haw of Queen's Park
NSC Patron
Apr 5, 2014
25,888
I’m pretty sure I’ve seen a lot of relatively sophisticated water craft with weaponry arriving in Ukraine; at least that’s what social media told me. If this is true, there will be a major push for Crimea soon. Those Russian troops in the outer western reaches south of the Dnipro river are very exposed now.
I would stake a lot on saying that Ukraine has close to zero chance of re-capturing Crimea.

This interview is a far better summary of the earlier point I was trying to make.

 
Last edited:


Worried Man Blues

Well-known member
Feb 28, 2009
7,283
Swansea
How BIG is Putin's carbon footprint! Totally depressing that this could go on for years..........and years........till he's dead.
 






Baldseagull

Well-known member
Jan 26, 2012
11,839
Crawley
I would stake a lot on saying that Ukraine has close to zero chance of re-capturing Crimea.

This interview is a far better summary of the earlier point I was trying to make.


Not for a while, but they can cut Crimea off from Russian supply lines, and if they do that I don't see how Russia can hold it.
 


sparkie

Well-known member
Jul 17, 2003
13,266
Hove
I think Crimea would be a lot easier to retake than Donetsk / Luhansk - simply because of the supply lines to Russia.

But Melitopol will be 1st to be liberated.
 




beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
36,013
Crimea is essentially a fortress, a couple of land bridges a few kilometers wide. too important for Russia to keep Sevastopol, and less home advantage, its not feasible to take militarily. the end of this war will be resolved with Crimea remaining Russia.
 




Nobby Cybergoat

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2021
8,622
Crimea is essentially a fortress, a couple of land bridges a few kilometers wide. too important for Russia to keep Sevastopol, and less home advantage, its not feasible to take militarily. the end of this war will be resolved with Crimea remaining Russia.
But that importance will have significance for the conflict. If Crimea falls, surely Putin does as well. The relatively small risk of losing Crimea will suck up a lot of Russian men and material.

Once Ukraine get to the south coast, they will be in a much better position to destroy the bridge for good and force the remainder of the black sea fleet backward. Then they can continually harry the logistics, as they've done in Kherson.

I think you're assuming it would be a straight fight, but the Ukranians know there's more than one way to skin a cat. It's a parlous position for the Russian military to be in
 




GT49er

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 1, 2009
49,171
Gloucester
I would think Ukranian special forces have already crossed the Dnieper to the east side
Hopefully working with other agencies to bring about the significant and symbolic destruction of the entire Russian Black Sea fleet. That will also be very hard for the Kremlin to 'hide' from the poor sods of Russians who believe their winning a wonderful special military operation.
 
Last edited:


Weststander

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2011
69,238
Withdean area
But that importance will have significance for the conflict. If Crimea falls, surely Putin does as well. The relatively small risk of losing Crimea will suck up a lot of Russian men and material.

Once Ukraine get to the south coast, they will be in a much better position to destroy the bridge for good and force the remainder of the black sea fleet backward. Then they can continually harry the logistics, as they've done in Kherson.

I think you're assuming it would be a straight fight, but the Ukranians know there's more than one way to skin a cat. It's a parlous position for the Russian military to be in
Exactly.

Ukriane don’t get suckered into static battles, an attritional numbers game, trench warfare.
 


Eeyore

Colonel Hee-Haw of Queen's Park
NSC Patron
Apr 5, 2014
25,888
Crimea is essentially a fortress, a couple of land bridges a few kilometers wide. too important for Russia to keep Sevastopol, and less home advantage, its not feasible to take militarily. the end of this war will be resolved with Crimea remaining Russia.
I'm not sure that Donetsk and Luhansk won't be involved in negotiation.

Again, my point better explained here.



I've not understood Russia's actions here. But I can see what they are doing now. Ukraine will struggle to move further than Kherson. Russia deploys forces to Donbass. If they do take Donbass they can declare the operation over and successful back home. They need to do this as I suspect the climate is getting toxic.

The question is if Ukraine is willing to talk. I wonder if the West has the will to offer support further or not. It has come at some cost to those governments.

I think the West and Russia will be looking for a way out in the coming months. Russia seems a lot closer to achieving it's primary goals (land bridge etc) having now seemingly jettisoned its other goals in the face of the opposition.
 
Last edited:


beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
36,013
Exactly.

Ukriane don’t get suckered into static battles, an attritional numbers game, trench warfare.
taking Crimea will be far more static, lacking the space to manoeuvre.

ceding Crimea could be the difference between being over this winter and a protacted conflict over years.
 






Weststander

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2011
69,238
Withdean area
taking Crimea will be far more static, lacking the space to manoeuvre.

ceding Crimea could be the difference between being over this winter and a protacted conflict over years.
Ways and means.

Strangle Russian forces in Crimea of resources, one by one take out hardware from afar or by drones, break the hearts of the genocidal invaders.

Parts of the UK media and the two Putin loving doomongers on nsc got Kherson city totally wrong. Predicting a Stalingrad-esque long winter with 10,000’s dying on both sides. Zelensky, his high command and overseas advisers are too cute … not suckered into that.

All these campaigns take time, an instant news age makes the impatient 2,000 miles away expect fast results. Ukrainians want their country back, they’re used to suffering in times past, they have national pride and patience on their side.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here