Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Politics] Russia invades Ukraine (24/02/2022)







cjd

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2006
6,306
La Rochelle
Thank goodness " birth of a orange" wasn't around the second World War. He has been shitting his pants on here since day 1.
 


herecomesaregular

We're in the pipe, 5 by 5
Oct 27, 2008
4,650
Still in Brighton
I apologised for that post. I still hold that view but I acknowledged it was not appropriate to post. Please accept that in the spirit it was meant. Your above post is below your usually very high standard.

Do you know what I actually wish for? Not one more life to be lost on either side except Putin and his facilitators of war. I wish for everyone else to put down their guns and go home to their loved ones without one more drop of blood being spilled.

Let's make that an end to the gruesome posts and I'll end by repeating that I'm sorry for my post.

Just seen this, agree wholeheartedly.
 




essbee1

Well-known member
Jun 25, 2014
4,725
I would imagine they're as fecked up as US soldiers were being dumped into Vietnam, only with a complete psycho like Putin pulling their strings.
I'm in no way saying that there won't be lots of bloodthirsty freaks among them, but I can't get excited by death....however justified it may seem.

Well nor do we. But that is ONLY way that Russia will see the light.
 




herecomesaregular

We're in the pipe, 5 by 5
Oct 27, 2008
4,650
Still in Brighton
And so....the lurch to savagery takes just minutes. Funny old lot, humans :shrug:

My take? In the war against the greater bad, lives will be lost.

Anyone joining the military and expecting that no mortal peril is on the agenda is a fool.

In the defence of a nation against tyrrany, you can't **** about.

The day for shedding a tear for Russian military dead is a long way off.

Agree, with some misgivings that many join the military to get out of poverty when other choices are severely limited. I don't have that sort of economic pressure so I still have some sympathy.
 








GT49er

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 1, 2009
49,181
Gloucester
And so....the lurch to savagery takes just minutes. Funny old lot, humans :shrug:

My take? In the war against the greater bad, lives will be lost.
1). Yes, of course. It's war - that means people killing other people. Hopefully 'we' kill nore than 'them'.


Anyone joining the military and expecting that no mortal peril is on the agenda is a fool.
2). Yes, I'm sure people that join the military because the allternative is being shot or spending 15 years in a labour camp in Siberia realise this all too well. As do young men who believe they are joining up to protect their country from aggressors.


In the defence of a nation against tyrrany, you can't **** about.
3). Not if you've got a gram of belief in your country's freedom, and courage, no you certainly can't!


The day for shedding a tear for Russian military dead is a long way off.
See above:
"And so....the lurch to savagery takes just minutes."
Exactly - when shedding a tear is a long way off.......................... it does.....
 


Baldseagull

Well-known member
Jan 26, 2012
11,839
Crawley
One thing to bear in mind, a good number of Russians that have been captured, have since rejoined the fight on the Ukrainian side. Who knows how many of the dead would have also done so, if they had the chance. I applaud the sinking of the ship, and the reduction of Russian servicemen, but the loss of young mens lives is still sad.
 


Blue Valkyrie

Not seen such Bravery!
Sep 1, 2012
32,165
Valhalla
Seeing reports on Twitter that the Moskva lost 452 men. Also reports saying it had two nuclear warheads on board.
Yes, 44 rescued by a Turkish vessel and 14 others were flown by the Russians to Sevastopol. That leaves the 452 unaccounted for at present, but some may also have been evacuated prior to sinking - no evidence either way on that though.
 




Eeyore

Colonel Hee-Haw of Queen's Park
NSC Patron
Apr 5, 2014
25,906
Seeing reports on Twitter that the Moskva lost 452 men. Also reports saying it had two nuclear warheads on board.

I always read Twitter. It's the only reliable source out there.

Anyway, CNN anchor.

[Tweet]1514979332971716619[/tweet]
 


Icy Gull

Back on the rollercoaster
Jul 5, 2003
72,015
Given the rhetoric coming from the Kremlin it seems the West is going to have to call Moscow’s bluff or back off with the supply of weapons. This is only going one way isn’t it unless Russia backs down, which seems highly unlikely.
 


Eric the meek

Fiveways Wilf
NSC Patron
Aug 24, 2020
7,095
Given the rhetoric coming from the Kremlin it seems the West is going to have to call Moscow’s bluff or back off with the supply of weapons. This is only going one way isn’t it unless Russia backs down, which seems highly unlikely.

It looks like we have already decided to call Moscow's bluff.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/world-europe-61124291

'Russia warns West of 'unpredictable consequences'' at 01:23

'The two-page diplomatic note – forwarded to the US State Department by the Russian embassy in Washington - warns that US and Nato weapons shipments are "adding fuel" to the conflict in Ukraine, and could lead to what Russian diplomats refer to as "unpredictable consequences".

It was sent on Tuesday, just as word of a new US military aid package for Ukraine had started to leak out. Only hours later President Biden approved the shipment of $800m of military assistance - including, for the first time, long range artillery weapons such as howitzers – with the aim of matching Russia’s military capability in Ukraine.

A senior US administration official was quoted as saying the warning could be seen as a concession by Russia that US and Nato military assistance to Ukraine was proving effective.
 




jakarta

Well-known member
May 25, 2007
15,738
Sullington
Given how well this is all going for Russia you do have to wonder if they have an equivalent of the Tory 1922 Committee (although with 9mm Glocks rather than Grey Suits) who might be calling on Vlad the Lad in the near future? :lolol:
 


golddene

Well-known member
Jul 28, 2012
2,019
I’m not criticising anyone on here, neither those for or against. Those who are seemingly glorifying in the military losses for the aggressor here, neither those who are, like myself, lamenting in this pointless waste of human life and totally unnecessary aggression. Which can only be blamed upon the greed and expansionism of Putin and his Government. With all the warnings we had, the previous invasions of Ukraine etc, the very well publicised build up of troops etc at the borders. Our elected leaders maybe could and certainly should have done more to prevent this outcome, but it seems to me this is just escalating to a full on confrontation of East vs West with possible Armageddon the only likely outcome. We, the human race, it seems will never be happy until we destroy our planet and each other. Scary times ahead for us all I’m afraid, with nothing seemingly anyone can do to prevent it.
My first post on this thoroughly depressing subject.
 


Eric the meek

Fiveways Wilf
NSC Patron
Aug 24, 2020
7,095
I’m not criticising anyone on here, neither those for or against. Those who are seemingly glorifying in the military losses for the aggressor here, neither those who are, like myself, lamenting in this pointless waste of human life and totally unnecessary aggression. Which can only be blamed upon the greed and expansionism of Putin and his Government. With all the warnings we had, the previous invasions of Ukraine etc, the very well publicised build up of troops etc at the borders. Our elected leaders maybe could and certainly should have done more to prevent this outcome, but it seems to me this is just escalating to a full on confrontation of East vs West with possible Armageddon the only likely outcome. We, the human race, it seems will never be happy until we destroy our planet and each other. Scary times ahead for us all I’m afraid, with nothing seemingly anyone can do to prevent it.
My first post on this thoroughly depressing subject.

Admiral Sir Tony Radakin, Chief of the Defence Staff, said in an interview that we had intelligence for several months that Putin's plan was to invade.

What would you have done to prevent the invasion, while not escalating to a full confrontation?
 


golddene

Well-known member
Jul 28, 2012
2,019
Admiral Sir Tony Radakin, Chief of the Defence Staff, said in an interview that we had intelligence for several months that Putin's plan was to invade.

What would you have done to prevent the invasion, while not escalating to a full confrontation?

Maybe remove the doubt of expansionism of NATO which may have calmed Russian aggression! Who knows, I don’t have the answers, just feel more could have been done to try to prevent this insecurity we are all facing today.
 




GT49er

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 1, 2009
49,181
Gloucester
I’m not criticising anyone on here, neither those for or against. Those who are seemingly glorifying in the military losses for the aggressor here, neither those who are, like myself, lamenting in this pointless waste of human life and totally unnecessary aggression. Which can only be blamed upon the greed and expansionism of Putin and his Government. With all the warnings we had, the previous invasions of Ukraine etc, the very well publicised build up of troops etc at the borders. Our elected leaders maybe could and certainly should have done more to prevent this outcome, but it seems to me this is just escalating to a full on confrontation of East vs West with possible Armageddon the only likely outcome. We, the human race, it seems will never be happy until we destroy our planet and each other. Scary times ahead for us all I’m afraid, with nothing seemingly anyone can do to prevent it.

Easy to say - but what exactly?
 


Eric the meek

Fiveways Wilf
NSC Patron
Aug 24, 2020
7,095
Maybe remove the doubt of expansionism of NATO which may have calmed Russian aggression! Who knows, I don’t have the answers, just feel more could have been done to try to prevent this insecurity we are all facing today.

I detect an element of confusion.

Just to clarify, Nato is a defensive alliance, member nations freely choosing to be in it, to defend against Russian aggression.
If Russia were not aggressive, Nato would have no reason to exist.

As a direct result of Putin's invasion of Ukraine, Finland and probably Sweden will want to join, thus furthering Nato's 'expansion' as you put it.

How do we remove the doubt of Nato 'expansionism' when, from Putin's perspective, Nato represents a genuine threat to Russia's security?
Are you suggesting Finland, Sweden and other concerned nations should not join Nato?
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here