Hiney said:Among other things about saying one thing to his face and then doing another:
"Everything I had suspected about Eriksson was shown in the quarter final against Brazil. He needed to take some brave decisions because Michael and David were clearly not capable of playing in the game. Of course both wanted to, but as a manager he had to take the decision away from them and be strong."
"At half time, you could see on the faces of the players that they were shell-shocked having conceded a goal to a very good team and they thought that was it. It was still only 1-1 and it was time for the manager to get to work, change the tactics and instil some belief in the team. How we could have done with Terry Venables that day. But Eriksson is not a passionate man, he's not a talker at all."
"He said nothing in the changing room at half time, absolutely f***-all, just stood there with a startled look on his face like he too believed we were f***ed. And that's the way it turned out. We went out of the World Cup without even a whimper, just rolled over and died becasue we didn't have a clue what we were doing out there against a side who played decent football, and because there was no team spirit, no fight, no togetherness. And the manager didn't say a word."
"He didn't shout, he didn't inspire, he didn't encourage and he didn't offer any tactical insight or switches."
And it goes on.
Fowler's book is well worth a read.
FFS! We have still got the xxxxxxxxxxx for a World Cup