That's not quite true. Marching against a war against a murdering tyrant doesn't mean that you support that murdering tyrant. That's a distinction that Hitchens and many of the war's supporters didn't understand.
QUOTE]
We'll have to disagree on this then, won't we. But Gwylan, my main argument is about how after Saddam was deposed, the left in the West deserted the causes in Iraq that they should have supported. i.e the emerging trade union and womens movement. The sole reason they didn't support them was because they thought if they did then somehow they'd be supporting Bush -so instead the left prefered the adage: "our enemys enemy is our friend" and subsequently stood idly by whilst any left wing opposition was destroyed religious facsists. But your argument works also works both ways - just because we supported the removal of Saddam doesn't mean we supported Bush. Hitchins (along with the likes of Nick Cohen) legitimised the voice of many on the left who were opposed to fascism and islamic fundamentalism. For that we'll always be grateful.