User removed 4
New member
- Thread starter
- #41
Put it like this, if i was DPP , the chances of anyone being charged for attacking burglars during or after the burglary would be slim to none, just like the little shit who got shot in norfolk, how many houses has he gone on to burgle ?But it's the thin end of the wedge, isn't it? If it's okay to harm them while committing the crime, what about afterwards? After all this guy was fleeing, he wasn't in the process of actually burgling the house when he was attacked. So now it's okay to attack a criminal after the event, is it?