clapham_gull
Legacy Fan
- Aug 20, 2003
- 25,878
I think a Champions League ban for a couple of seasons would be appropriate and universally supported.
There won't be a punishment I don't think.
Though their negotiating position has just been exploded. They won't be able to argue for a larger slice of the pie for a long time
What rules have they broken?
While I can understand the desire to punish the clubs, without rule breaking any punishment would be appealed and overturned so is pointless.
There HAVE to be sanctions that (a) punish them for taking football to the brink across the whole of Europe in such an underhand and arrogant manner, and (b) discouraging owners from ever attempting a similat coup in the future.
This cannot be brushed under the carpet simply because of the size and status of the clubs involved. This is football's opportunity to restore some equilibrium and cannot be squandered. Time for the football authorities to step up and show some moral courage and leadership.
What rules have they broken?
While I can understand the desire to punish the clubs, without rule breaking any punishment would be appealed and overturned so is pointless.
I think a Champions League ban for a couple of seasons would be appropriate and universally supported.
Nothing that harms the league position. The fans and players stopped this. Maybe they should be made to study for a degree in English social history and go litter picking on the terraces of lower leagues every weekend for five years.
Although I'd be okay with fines- to be sent down to the bottom of the pyramid.
The proposed contract was 177 pages long, this wasn’t something that was dreamed up overnight. They have planned this, and lied about it to everyone.
They signed this contract, they knew exactly what they were doing. Perhaps less of a punishment for City and Chelsea cos they bottled it first, but, there had to be consequences.